Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6094
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Probabilistic risk assessment of the energy saving shortfall in energy performance contracting projects–a case study
Authors: Lee, P
Lam, TIP 
Yik, FWH
Chan, EHW 
Issue Date: Nov-2013
Source: Energy and buildings, Nov. 2013, v. 66, p. 353–363
Abstract: Lack of a proper assessment method on performance risks in Energy Performance Contracting (EPC)projects is one of the reasons hindering the further development of energy service companies (ESCOs)market. This paper proposes a simulation-based method to evaluate the probability of energy savingshortfall taking into account the variations in the influential parameters, including weather conditions,occupancy, operating hours, thermostat set-point, etc., during the contract period. The proposed methodinvolves the use of a detailed building energy simulation programme, sensitivity analysis and MonteCarlo simulation techniques. Empirical data is also used to develop the probability distribution functionsfor the identified parameters to simulate the actual yearly variations in the post-retrofit conditions. Areal case study of replacement of heat rejection system for a central chiller plant in Hong Kong is usedto demonstrate the application of this probabilistic method. The result shows that the possible energysavings after a 1-year retrofit period ranges from 393,000 kW h (2.86%) to 1098,000 kW h (10.8%) with90% statistical significance.
Keywords: Performance contracting
ESCOs
Risks
Monte Carlo simulation
Sensitivity analysis
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Energy and buildings 
ISSN: 0378-7788
EISSN: 1872-6178
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.018
Rights: © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Energy and Buildings. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Energy and Buildings, v. 66, (Nov. 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.018.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
4_Lee_Risk_Energy_Contracting_Highlights.pdfHighlights (Pre-published version)15.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
3_Lee_Risk_Energy_Contracting_Tables_with_Captions.pdfTables with Captions (Pre-published version)44.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
2_Lee_Risk_Energy_Contracting_Figures.pdfFigures (Pre-published version)601.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
1_Lee_Risk_Energy_Contracting_Manuscript.pdfManuscript (Pre-published version)156.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

195
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

Downloads

430
Citations as of Apr 28, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

40
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

35
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of May 2, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.