Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/60208
Title: Validity and reliability analysis of the Chinese cancer pain assessment tool
Other Titles: 中国人癌症疼痛评估工具效度与信度的分析
Authors: Wu, YP
Qin, HY
Fan, YY
Xian, MZ
Chung, JWY
Wong, TKS
Keywords: Cancer pain Assessment tool
Reliability
Validity
Issue Date: 2001
Publisher: 中国学术期刊(光盘版)电子杂志社
Source: 护士进修杂志 (Journal of nurses training), Oct. 2001, v. 16, no. 10, p. 737-738 How to cite?
Journal: 护士进修杂志 (Journal of nurses training) 
Abstract: 目的: 探讨香港钟慧仪博士研制适合中国文化背景的多层面的疼痛评估表 ,《中国人癌症疼痛评估工具》(ChineseCancerPainAssesmenttool,CCPAT) ,的效度与信度。
方法: 测查 319名癌痛患者 ,其中 30名同时用CCPAT和马克盖尔疼痛调查表 (TheMcgillPainQuesionnaire ,MPQ)进行问卷 ,使用因素分析寻找量度疼痛概念有多少因素 ;通过集中癌痛组的CCPAT和MPQ有关项目进行相关总分计算测试 ,确立CCPAT的效度。另抽出 30名患者由两名调查员用CCPAT量表同时进行问卷 ,将CCPAT每一项目作半机率选择 ,计算其信度系数 ,然后将其他患者用CCPAT进行问卷 ,计算其系数的平均值 ,测试在内部的一致性。
结果: 测查 319名癌痛患者 ,CCPA与MPQ的变数相连 ,建立一致的效度 ,比率信度是 0 96 ,内部一致性系数 0 88。
结论: 验证该癌痛评估工具信度、效度良好。对临床评估癌痛病人的疼痛强度有较好的参考价值。
Objective: To discuss the validity and reliability of Chinese cancer pain assessment tool(CCPAT),a multi-layer assessment table that was developed by Doctor Zhong Huiyi from Hong Kong and adapted to Chinese culture background .
Method: 319 cases of cancer patients were measured. Among them, 30 patients were questioned by MPQ (the Mcgill pain questionnaire ) and CCPAT.Respectively.Using factor analysis to research for how many factors will influence measured pain concepts .Calculation of total corresponding score was made by gathering all the items of CCPAT and MPQ of the cancer pain group to determine the validity of CCPAT.Other 30 cases of patients were questioned by two investigators. Every factor in CCPAT was carried out half-probability selection and its validity index was calculated.The remaining patients were questioned by CCPAT only .The mean value of the indexes were calculated and the interior coherence was tested .
Result: among 319 measured patients ,the variables od CCPAT and MPQ were linked and an accordant validity was established.The rate validity was 0.96 and the interior coherence index was 0.88.
Conclusion: CCPAT has a good reliability and validity.It’s a good reference to evaluated the pain intensity of cancer pain patients in clinic.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/60208
ISSN: 1002-6975
Rights: © 2001 中国学术期刊电子杂志出版社。本内容的使用仅限于教育、科研之目的。
© 2001 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. It is to be used strictly for educational and research purposes.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
r06555.pdf83.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

20
Last Week
1
Last month
Checked on Aug 20, 2017

Download(s)

6
Checked on Aug 20, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.