Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/5746
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorYeung, FY-
dc.creatorChan, APC-
dc.creatorChan, DWM-
dc.creatorChiang, YH-
dc.creatorYang, H-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:22:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:22:35Z-
dc.identifier.issn0733-9364-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/5746-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rights© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineersen_US
dc.rightsThis is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. The open URL of the article: http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000622en_US
dc.subjectBenchmarkingen_US
dc.subjectKey performance indicators (KPIs)en_US
dc.subjectComposite perfromance index (CPI)en_US
dc.subjectReliability interval method (RIM)en_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.titleDeveloping a benchmarking model for construction projects in Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this manuscript: John F. Y. Yeungen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this manuscript: Y. H. Chiangen_US
dc.identifier.spage705-
dc.identifier.epage716-
dc.identifier.volume139-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000622-
dcterms.abstractThis paper attempts to incorporate both leading and lagging KPIs and apply the reliability interval method (RIM) to formulate a benchmarking model to assess project success in Hong Kong. A list of leading and lagging KPIs was complied based on a comprehensive literature review. This list of KPIs was used to develop a survey questionnaire and RIM was subsequently used to analyze the survey results and determine the relative importance and rankings of various leading and lagging KPIs. The results reveal that the top 10 KPIs to evaluate the success of construction projects in Hong Kong (in descending order) were (1) safety performance, (2) cost performance, (3) time performance, (4) quality performance, (5) client’s satisfaction, (6) effectiveness of communication, (7) end user’s satisfaction, (8) effectiveness of planning, (9) functionality, and (10) environmental performance. Finally, a composite performance index (CPI) was derived by means of RIM to provide a comprehensive assessment of construction project success in Hong Kong. Different construction projects can now be assessed on the same basis for benchmarking and project monitoring purposes.-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of construction engineering and management, June 2013, v. 139, no. 6, p. 705-716-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of construction engineering and management-
dcterms.issued2013-06-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000318653100013-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84877757905-
dc.identifier.eissn1943-7862-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr62861-
dc.description.ros2012-2013 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oapreprint_postprint-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yeung_Benchmarking_Model_Construction.pdfPre-published version335.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

39
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Aug 28, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

30
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Oct 20, 2020

Page view(s)

554
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 20, 2020

Download(s)

2,459
Citations as of Oct 20, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.