Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/5070
Title: Quantitative and qualitative approaches in the study of poverty and adolescent development : separation or integration?
Authors: Leung, JTY
Shek, DTL 
Keywords: Adolescent development
Economic disadvantage
Family processes
Qualitative study
Quantitative study
Issue Date: Jun-2011
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter
Source: International journal of adolescent medicine and health, June 2011, v. 23, no. 2, p. 115-121 How to cite?
Journal: International journal of adolescent medicine and health 
Abstract: This paper examines the use of quantitative and qualitative approaches to study the impact of economic disadvantage on family processes and adolescent development. Quantitative research has the merits of objectivity, good predictive and explanatory power, parsimony, precision and sophistication of analysis. Qualitative research, in contrast, provides a detailed, holistic, in-depth understanding of social reality and allows illumination of new insights. With the pragmatic considerations of methodological appropriateness, design flexibility, and situational responsiveness in responding to the research inquiry, a mixed methods approach could be a possibility of integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches and offers an alternative strategy to study the impact of economic disadvantage on family processes and adolescent development.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/5070
ISSN: 0334-0139 (print)
2191-0278 (online)
DOI: 10.1515/IJAMH.2011.020
Rights: ©2011 by Walter de Gruyter. The journal web site is located at http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ijamh
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
C15.pdf727.97 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of Jun 2, 2016

Page view(s)

324
Last Week
8
Last month
Checked on Sep 25, 2016

Download(s)

592
Checked on Sep 25, 2016

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.