Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4629
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Building and Real Estate | - |
dc.creator | Chan, HL | - |
dc.creator | Chan, DWM | - |
dc.creator | Lord, W | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-11T08:28:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-11T08:28:22Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0267-2359 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/4629 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sweet & Maxwell | en_US |
dc.rights | Construction Law Journal © 2011 Sweet & Maxwell and its Contributors | en_US |
dc.subject | Comparative law | en_US |
dc.subject | Construction contracts | en_US |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | en_US |
dc.subject | Risk | en_US |
dc.subject | Target cost contracts | en_US |
dc.title | Key risk factors and risk mitigation measures for target cost contracts in construction - a comparison between the West and the East | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.description.otherinformation | Author name used in this manuscript: Wayne E. Lord | en_US |
dc.description.otherinformation | Author name used in this manuscript: Joseph H.L. Chan | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 441 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 458 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
dcterms.abstract | This article is an extension of a research article published in the July 2010 issue of the Construction Law Journal in which the findings of seven face-to-face structured interviews, conducted in Hong Kong, on the perceptions of key risk factors and risk mitigation measures for Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) contracts and Target Cost Contracts (TCC) were reported. Further to this previous research undertaken in Hong Kong, five similar in-depth structured interviews were conducted in the United Kingdom. The interviewees perceived the change in scope of work, quality and clarity of tender documents, selection of competent subcontractors and unforeseen ground conditions as key risk factors encountered in GMP/TCC construction projects. They also considered a basket of measures including: the adjudication of bids in risk assessment; total reflection on potential risks in tender documents; use of risk registers; and development of a proper risk management process, as being effective in risk mitigation. The UK findings were compared and contrasted with those from Hong Kong. It was found that the key risk factors associated with GMP/TCC contracts between the two jurisdictions *Const. L.J. 442 are similar by nature in general. However, differences in perceptions on risk mitigation measures are also observed, which may be due to the disparities in the implementation of GMP/TCC methodology between the two regions. | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Construction law journal, Sept. 2011, v. 27, no. 6, p. 441-458 | - |
dcterms.isPartOf | Construction law journal | - |
dcterms.issued | 2011-09 | - |
dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r56808 | - |
dc.description.ros | 2011-2012 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | - |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_IR/PIRA | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PolyU IR Submission 2011_CLJ_1.pdf | Pre-published version | 184.76 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
351
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
Downloads
775
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.