Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/40022
Title: Predicting pressure sore risk with the Braden(modified),Norton and WCUMS Scales
Other Titles: 3种评估表预测压疮效果的比较研究
Authors: Xue, X
Liu, H
Jing, X
孙志敏
童淑萍
Kuang, HR 
Pang, M 
Wong, KS
Ho, SJ
Keywords: Pressure score
Nursing assessment
Predictive of tests
Issue Date: 2004
Publisher: 中华护理学会
Source: 中华护理杂志 (Chinese journal of nursing), 2004, no. 4, p. 241-243 How to cite?
Journal: 中华护理杂志 (Chinese journal of nursing) 
Abstract: 目的 :比较 3种压疮危险性评估表Braden评估表 (修订版 )、Norton评估表、华西医科大学评估表 (WestChinaUniversitymedicalSciencesScale,简称WCUMS评估表 )的预测效果 ,寻找一种最适合国情、有效而可靠的压疮评估表 ,合理利用人力资源 ,及时指导护士对压疮高危患者采取预防性护理措施。方法 :3名护士分别运用 3种评估表 ,同时、独立地对同一病人进行评估 ,共有 2 2 2名病人接受评估。结果 :Braden评估表 (修订版 )与Norton评估表、WCUMS评估表比较 ,能较好平衡敏感度和特异度 (首末次评分临界值均为 2 2分 )。 3种评估表都有相对较高的阴性预测值 (≥ 98% ) ,但阳性预测值均偏低。结论 :Braden评估表 (修订版 )压疮预测效果较好 ,可以在压疮高发的人群中应用。
Objectives: To compare the predictive power of the three pressure sore risk calculators: Braden (modified), Norton and WCUMS (West China University medical Sciences Scale) scales. Method: Two hundred and twenty-two patients, free of pressure sore on admission, were assessed using the three scales by the three independent assessors. Results: Braden (modified) scale demonstrated better balance of sensitivity and specificity at the cut-off core of 22 than the other two scales. All three scales had high negative predictive values (≥98%), while the positive predictive value was low. Conclusions: The Braden (modified) scale is a more effective in pressure sore risk prediction and more suitable for use in clinical settings particularly where the incidence rate of pressure sore is high.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/40022
ISSN: 0254-1769
Rights: © 2004 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. It is to be used strictly for educational and research use.
© 2004 中国学术期刊电子杂志出版社。本内容的使用仅限于教育、科研之目的。
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
r18590.pdf108.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

55
Last Week
2
Last month
Checked on Aug 20, 2017

Download(s)

26
Checked on Aug 20, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.