Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/40015
Title: A comparison of the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and ultrasound therapy on managing heel pain
Other Titles: 体外冲击波与超声波治疗跟痛症疗效对照研究
Authors: Chang, H
Zheng, LY 
Keywords: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy
Ultrasound therapy
Heel pain
Issue Date: 2003
Publisher: 河北医科大学
Source: 中华物理医学与康复杂志 (Chinese journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation), 2003, v. 25, no. 10, p. 599-602 How to cite?
Journal: 中华物理医学与康复杂志 (Chinese journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation) 
Abstract: 目的 比较体外冲击波与超声波两种治疗方法对跟痛症患者的疗效。方法  3 7名跟痛症患者被分为外冲击波治疗组 (冲击波组 )、超声波治疗组 (超声波组 )与对照组。冲击波治疗选用频率 4Hz ,强度0 .2 3~ 0 .3 7mJ/mm2 ,每次冲击 10 0 0次 ,治疗时间约 15min ,每周 1次 ,共 3次 ;超声波治疗选用频率 1MHz ,强度 1W /cm2 ,每次治疗 5min ,每周 3次 ,共治疗 9次 ,治疗部位均为患侧足跟后部。采用视觉模拟评级法 (VAS )评估患者双足负重时的疼痛强度 ,包括早晨起床时、最长持续行走或站立后、足底牵拉及足跟受压检查 ,每次检查时记录患者 1周内最长可持续行走或站立时间。结果 患者治疗 3周后及治疗后 3周随访发现 ,足底牵拉检查、足跟受压检查和患者最长可持续行走或站立时间均显示体外冲击波疗法效果显著。结论 体外冲击波治疗跟痛症的疗效优于超声波治疗 ,且疗效持久
Objective To examine the relative effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and ultrasound therapy (US) on managing heel pain. Methods Thirty seven patients were divided into 3 groups, two treatment groups (groups 1 and 2) and one control group (group 3).Group 1 received ESWT once a week for 3 consecutive weeks.Parameters were set at a frequency of 4Hz with a total of 1000 impulses, intensity at 0.23 to 0.37mJ/mm 2. Group 2 received continuous ultrasound therapy for 5 minutes in each session, three times a week for three consecutive weeks. Parameters were set at 1MHz, intensity level at 1W/mm 2. Group 3 was the control group and no treatment was given during the study period.The intensity of morning pain on weight bearing, pain triggered by prolonged walking/standing, pain on tension and palpation tests were assessed by use of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) before and after each treatment session, including the follow up session.In addition, Mayo Clinical Scoring System (MCSS) was used to evaluate the treatment outcomes. Results After 3 weeks of treatment plus 3 weeks follow up,outcome measures had shown statistical significant difference on the intensity of pain on tension test( P =0.037),the intensity of pain on palpation test ( P =0.019) and the maximum duration of prolonged walking or standing ( P =0.002). Conclusion ESWT is more effective and efficient for managing heel pain than ultrasound therapy.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/40015
ISSN: 0254-1424
Rights: © 2003 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House. It is to be used strictly for educational and research use.
© 2003 中国学术期刊电子杂志出版社。本内容的使用仅限于教育、科研之目的。
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
r17587.pdf148.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

42
Last Week
2
Last month
Checked on Dec 11, 2017

Download(s)

62
Checked on Dec 11, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.