Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Insight into resolving construction disputes by mediation/adjudication in Hong Kong
Authors: Chau, KW 
Keywords: Arbitration
Dispute resolution
Hong Kong
Construction industry
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2007
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Source: Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, Apr. 2007, v. 133, no. 2, p. 143-147 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice 
Abstract: Resolving construction disputes using an adversarial approach is considered to be in opposition of the maintenance of a harmonious relationship between two parties. The modern arbitration process may emulate the litigation proceeding leading to delay and cost escalation. During the past decade, the Hong Kong Government has implemented a mediation clause as an alternative mode for settlement of construction disputes. In this paper, the experience and insight into resolving construction disputes by integrating mediation and then arbitration in Hong Kong are highlighted. The state-of-the-art modern mediation process and its philosophical origins are reviewed. The shortcomings of the present system are pinpointed. The success of the adjudication now practiced in the United Kingdom may suggest that there is a place for another process of dispute resolution, which may help improve the situation. The prospect of the proposed mediation/adjudication and then arbitration mechanism is discussed with particular reference to the construction industry in Hong Kong.
ISSN: 1052-3928
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:2(143)
Rights: Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice © 2007 ASCE. The published version in ASCE's Engineering Database is located at:
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JPIEEP2.pdfPre-published version105.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record


Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Feb 7, 2016


Citations as of Feb 6, 2016

Page view(s)

Checked on Feb 7, 2016

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.