Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112972
| Title: | Artificial intelligence performance in ultrasound-based lymph node diagnosis : a systematic review and meta-analysis | Authors: | Han, X Qu, J Chui, ML Gunda, ST Chen, Z Qin, J King, AD Chu, WCW Cai, J Ying, MTC |
Issue Date: | Dec-2025 | Source: | BMC cancer, Dec. 2025, v. 25, no. 1, 73 | Abstract: | Background and objectives: Accurate classification of lymphadenopathy is essential for determining the pathological nature of lymph nodes (LNs), which plays a crucial role in treatment selection. The biopsy method is invasive and carries the risk of sampling failure, while the utilization of non-invasive approaches such as ultrasound can minimize the probability of iatrogenic injury and infection. With the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, the diagnostic efficiency of LNs is further enhanced. This study evaluates the performance of ultrasound-based AI applications in the classification of benign and malignant LNs. Methods: The literature research was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases as of June 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated to assess the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound-based AI in classifying benign and malignant LNs. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 1,355 studies were identified and reviewed. Among these studies, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 2,354 cases were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of ultrasound-based machine learning in classifying benign and malignant LNs were 0.836 (95% CI [0.805, 0.863]), 0.850 (95% CI [0.805, 0.886]), and 33.331 (95% CI [22.873, 48.57]), respectively, indicating no publication bias (p = 0.12). Subgroup analyses may suggest that the location of lymph nodes, validation methods, and type of primary tumor are the sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion: AI can accurately differentiate benign from malignant LNs. Given the widespread use of ultrasonography in diagnosing malignant LNs in cancer patients, there is significant potential for integrating AI-based decision support systems into clinical practice to enhance the diagnostic accuracy. |
Keywords: | Computer-aided diagnosis Lymph node Machine learning Radiomics Ultrasonography |
Publisher: | BioMed Central Ltd. | Journal: | BMC cancer | EISSN: | 1471-2407 | DOI: | 10.1186/s12885-025-13447-y | Rights: | © The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The following publication Han, X., Qu, J., Chui, ML. et al. Artificial intelligence performance in ultrasound-based lymph node diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 25, 73 (2025) is available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13447-y. |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s12885-025-13447-y.pdf | 2.4 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



