RVISA : reasoning and verification for implicit sentiment analysis

Abstract

Under the context of the increasing social demand for fine-grained sentiment analysis (SA), implicit sentiment analysis (ISA) poses a significant challenge owing to the absence of salient cue words in expressions. Thus, reliable reasoning is required to understand how sentiment is evoked, enabling the identification of implicit sentiments. In the era of large language models (LLMs), encoder-decoder (ED) LLMs have emerged as popular backbone models for SA applications, given their impressive text comprehension and reasoning capabilities across diverse tasks. In comparison, decoder-only (DO) LLMs exhibit superior natural language generation and in-context learning capabilities. However, their responses may contain misleading or inaccurate information. To accurately identify implicit sentiments with reliable reasoning, this study introduces a two-stage reasoning framework named Reasoning and Verification for Implicit Sentiment Analysis (RVISA), which leverages the generation ability of DO LLMs and reasoning ability of ED LLMs to train an enhanced reasoner. The framework involves three-hop reasoning prompting to explicitly furnish sentiment elements as cues. The generated rationales are then used to fine-tune an ED LLM into a skilled reasoner. Additionally, we develop a straightforward yet effective answer-based verification mechanism to ensure the reliability of reasoning learning. Evaluation of the proposed method on two benchmark datasets demonstrates that it achieves state-of-the-art performance in ISA.