Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112684
| Title: | Safety of repeated low-level red-light therapy for myopia : a systematic review | Authors: | Chen, Y Xiong, R Yang, S Zhu, Z Li, H Xiang, K Congdon, N Wang, W He, M |
Issue Date: | Nov-2024 | Source: | Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology, Nov.-Dec. 2024, v. 13, no. 6, 100124 | Abstract: | Purpose: Establishing the safety profile of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy is necessary prior to its widespread clinical implementation. Methods: We conducted a systematic review (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42024516676) of articles across seven databases from inception through February 10, 2024, with keywords related to myopia and RLRL therapy. Pooled safety outcomes and risk-to-benefit ratios were reported, and incidence of side effects was compared with other antimyopia interventions. Results: Among 689 screened articles, 20 studies (2.90 %; median duration 9 months, longest 24 months) were analysed, encompassing 2380 participants aged 3–18 years and 1436 individuals undergoing RLRL therapy. Two case reports described an identical patient with reversible decline in visual acuity and optical coherence tomography (OCT) abnormalities, completely resolved 4 months after treatment cessation. No cases of permanent vision loss were reported. Temporary afterimage was the most common ocular symptom following treatment, resolving within 6 minutes in reported studies. The number needed to harm outweighed the number needed to treat by a ratio of 12.7–21.4 for a person with –3D to –8D myopia treated with RLRL therapy. Incidence of side effects from RLRL was 0.088 per 100 patient-years (95 % confidence interval, 0.02–0.50). Conclusions: No irreversible visual function loss or ocular structural damage was identified with RLRL. Fundus photography and OCT before and during therapy, alongside home monitoring of visual acuity and duration of afterimages, are necessary to identify side effects. Further adequately powered studies of longer duration are needed to evaluate long-term safety of RLRL. |
Keywords: | Myopia prevention Refractive error Repeated low-level red-light Risk-to-benefit Safety |
Publisher: | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | Journal: | Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology | EISSN: | 2162-0989 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100124 | Rights: | © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Asia-Paci Academy of Ophthalmology and Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The following publication Chen, Y., Xiong, R., Yang, S., Zhu, Z., Li, H., Xiang, K., Congdon, N., Wang, W., & He, M. (2024). Safety of repeated low-level red-light therapy for myopia: A systematic review. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, 13(6), 100124 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100124. |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-s2.0-S2162098924001440-main.pdf | 3.04 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



