Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/112509
| Title: | Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5 L, SF-6Dv2, QLU-C10D and FACT-8D among survivors of classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma | Authors: | Xu, RH Zhao, Z Pan, T Monteiro, A Gu, H Dong, D |
Issue Date: | Jun-2025 | Source: | The European journal of health economics, June 2025, v. 26, no. 4, p. 671-682 | Abstract: | Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the measurement properties of EQ-5D-5 L, SF-6Dv2, QLU-C10D, and FACT-8D in survivors of Classical Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (CHL). Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted from May to August 2022 to collect data. Chinese value sets were used to estimate the utility scores for EQ-5D-5 L, SF-6Dv2, and QLU-C10D, while the Australian value set was used for FACT-8D. The measurement properties assessed included ceiling and floor effects, convergent validity (assessing associations between similar dimensions/utility scores using Spearman’s rank correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient), and known-group validity (measures could differentiate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between risk groups). Results: A total of 534 CHL survivors participated in the survey and completed the questionnaire. All dimensions of EQ-5D-5 L, SF-6D (except for vitality), QLU-C10D, and FACT-8D showed ceiling effects, ranging from 18 to 91.6%. The EQ-5D-5 L demonstrated the higher ceiling effects compared to other measures, with 33% of patients reporting full health on this scale. All 30 pairs of associations between similar dimensions from the four measures were statistically significant, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.29 to 0.77. Regarding utility scores, the EQ-5D-5 L utility score showed a stronger correlation with SF-6Dv2 than with the other two measures. Statistically significant correlations of utility scores between the four measures were observed. EQ-5D-5 L can significantly differentiate HRQoL among all known-groups, while SF-6Dv2, QLU-C10D, and FACT-8D showed a less strong discriminant ability. Conclusions: EQ-5D-5 L outperformed SF-6Dv2 in terms of agreement with cancer-specific PRMs and discriminant ability. However, SF-6Dv2 showed stronger associations with similar dimensions of QLU-C10D and FACT-8D, indicating high convergent validity. The generic PBMs are sensitive enough to measure HRQoL in survivors of CHL. |
Keywords: | EQ-5D FACT-8D I10 Lymphoma Measurement properties Oncology Preference-based measure QLU-C10D SF-6D |
Publisher: | Springer | Journal: | The European journal of health economics | ISSN: | 1618-7598 | EISSN: | 1618-7601 | DOI: | 10.1007/s10198-024-01730-x | Rights: | © The Author(s) 2024 This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The following publication Xu, R.H., Zhao, Z., Pan, T. et al. Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5 L, SF-6Dv2, QLU-C10D and FACT-8D among survivors of classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Health Econ 26, 671–682 (2025) is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-024-01730-x. |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s10198-024-01730-x.pdf | 1.69 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
3
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



