Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/110335
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Efficacy of diaphragmatic breathing exercise on respiratory, cognitive, and motor function outcomes in patients with stroke : a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Abdullahi, A
Wong, TW 
Ng, SS 
Issue Date: 2024
Source: Frontiers in neurology, 2024, v. 14, 1233408
Abstract: Background: Stroke disrupts the functions carried out by the brain such as the control of movement, sensation, and cognition. Disruption of movement control results in hemiparesis that affects the function of the diaphragm. Impaired function of the diaphragm can in turn affect many outcomes such as respiratory, cognitive, and motor function. The aim of this study is to carry out a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of diaphragmatic breathing exercise on respiratory, cognitive, and motor outcomes after stroke.
Method: The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023422293). PubMED, Embase, Web of Science (WoS), PEDro, Scopus, and CENTRAL databases were searched until September 2023. Only randomized controlled trials comparing diaphragmatic breathing exercise with a control were included. Information on the study authors, time since stroke, mean age, height, weight, sex, and the protocols of the experimental and control interventions including intensity, mean scores on the outcomes such as respiratory, cognitive, and motor functions were extracted. Cochrane risks of bias assessment tool and PEDro scale were used to assess the risks of bias and methodological quality of the studies. Narrative synthesis and meta-analysis were used to summarize the results, which were then presented in tables, risk-of-bias graph, and forest plots. The meta-analysis was carried out on respiratory function [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow (PEF)] and motor function (trunk impairment, and internal and external oblique muscles activity).
Results: Six studies consisting of 151 participants were included. The results of the meta-analyses showed that diaphragmatic breathing exercise is only superior to the control at improving respiratory function, FVC (MD = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.04, P < 0.00001), FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.11 to 0.52, P = 0.002), and PEF (MD = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.15 to 1.81, P < 0.00001).
Conclusion: There is limited evidence suggesting that diaphragmatic breathing exercise may help enhance respiratory function, which may help enhance recovery of function post stroke.
Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023422293.
Keywords: Stroke
Breathing exercises
Vital capacity
Forced expiratory volume
Maximal respiratory pressures
Activities of daily living
Quality of life
Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation
Journal: Frontiers in neurology 
EISSN: 1664-2295
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1233408
Rights: Copyright © 2024 Abdullahi, Wong and Ng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
The following publication Abdullahi A, Wong TWL and Ng SSM (2024) Efficacy of diaphragmatic breathing exercise on respiratory, cognitive, and motor function outcomes in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 14:1233408 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1233408.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fneur-14-1233408.pdf2.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

22
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

11
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.