Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/107665
| Title: | Respiratory-correlated 4-dimensional magnetic resonance fingerprinting for liver cancer radiation therapy motion management | Authors: | Liu, C Li, T Cao, P Hui, ES Wong, YL Wang, Z Xiao, H Zhi, S Zhou, T Li, W Lam, SK Cheung, ALY Lee, VHF Ying, M Cai, J |
Issue Date: | 1-Oct-2023 | Source: | International journal of radiation oncology biology physics, 1 Oct. 2023, v. 117, no. 2, p. 493-504 | Abstract: | Purpose: The objective of this study was to develop a respiratory-correlated (RC) 4-dimensional (4D) imaging technique based on magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) (RC-4DMRF) for liver tumor motion management in radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: Thirteen patients with liver cancer were prospectively enrolled in this study. k-space MRF signals of the liver were acquired during free-breathing using the fast acquisition with steady-state precession sequence on a 3T scanner. The signals were binned into 8 respiratory phases based on respiratory surrogates, and interphase displacement vector fields were estimated using a phase-specific low-rank optimization method. Hereafter, the tissue property maps, including T1 and T2 relaxation times, and proton density, were reconstructed using a pyramid motion-compensated method that alternatively optimized interphase displacement vector fields and subspace images. To evaluate the efficacy of RC-4DMRF, amplitude motion differences and Pearson correlation coefficients were determined to assess measurement agreement in tumor motion between RC-4DMRF and cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); mean absolute percentage errors of the RC-4DMRF–derived tissue maps were calculated to reveal tissue quantification accuracy using digital human phantom; and tumor-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio of RC-4DMRF images was compared with that of planning CT and contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) images. A paired Student t test was used for statistical significance analysis with a P value threshold of .05. Results: RC-4DMRF achieved excellent agreement in motion measurement with cine MRI, yielding the mean (± standard deviation) Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.95 ± 0.05 and 0.93 ± 0.09 and amplitude motion differences of 1.48 ± 1.06 mm and 0.81 ± 0.64 mm in the superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. Moreover, RC-4DMRF achieved high accuracy in tissue property quantification, with mean absolute percentage errors of 8.8%, 9.6%, and 5.0% for T1, T2, and proton density, respectively. Notably, the tumor contrast-to-noise ratio in RC-4DMRI–derived T1 maps (6.41 ± 3.37) was found to be the highest among all tissue property maps, approximately equal to that of CE-MRI (6.96 ± 1.01, P = .862), and substantially higher than that of planning CT (2.91 ± 1.97, P = .048). Conclusions: RC-4DMRF demonstrated high accuracy in respiratory motion measurement and tissue properties quantification, potentially facilitating tumor motion management in liver radiation therapy. |
Publisher: | Elsevier Inc. | Journal: | International journal of radiation oncology biology physics | ISSN: | 0360-3016 | EISSN: | 1879-355X | DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.015 | Rights: | © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. © 2023. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ The following publication Liu, C., Li, T., Cao, P., Hui, E. S., Wong, Y.-L., Wang, Z., Xiao, H., Zhi, S., Zhou, T., Li, W., Lam, S. K., Cheung, A. L.-Y., Lee, V. H.-F., Ying, M., & Cai, J. (2023). Respiratory-Correlated 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting for Liver Cancer Radiation Therapy Motion Management. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 117(2), 493-504 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.015. |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu_Respiratory-correlated_4-dimensional_Magnetic.pdf | Pre-Published version | 2.03 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
51
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
Downloads
33
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



