Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/106055
Title: Priming intermittent theta burst stimulation for hemiparetic upper limb after stroke : a randomized controlled trial
Authors: Zhang, JJ 
Bai, Z
Fong, KNK 
Issue Date: Jul-2022
Source: Stroke, July 2022, v. 53, no. 7, p. 2171-2181
Abstract: Background: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) creates a state with increased excitability that permits treatment modalities to induce neuroplasticity and motor learning. Continuous theta burst stimulation before iTBS may induce metaplasticity and boost the facilitatory effect of iTBS. This study investigated the effects of priming iTBS (ie, applying continuous theta burst stimulation before iTBS) on poststroke hemiparetic upper limb recovery.
Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 42 patients with chronic stroke were recruited and randomly allocated to 10 sessions of either priming iTBS, nonpriming iTBS, or sham stimulation to the ipsilesional motor cortex, immediately before robot-assisted training. Outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity, Action Research Arm Test and mean movement velocity during each robot-assisted training session. Twenty-one patients were enrolled for measuring the sensorimotor beta event-related desynchronization induced by either mirror visual feedback or movement.
Results: The Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores revealed a significant time-by-group interaction (P=0.011). Priming and nonpriming iTBS were both superior to sham stimulation in post hoc comparisons; however, the superiority was diminished at follow-up. Among patients with a higher functioning upper limb, priming iTBS yielded a significantly greater improvement in Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity scores than nonpriming iTBS (P=0.025) and sham stimulation (P=0.029) did. No significant interaction was found when analyzing the Action Research Arm Test and mean movement velocity. Priming iTBS enhanced the patients' mirror visual feedback-induced high beta sensorimotor event-related desynchronization over their ipsilesional hemisphere.
Conclusions: Priming and nonpriming iTBS are both superior to sham stimulation in enhancing treatment gains from robot-assisted training, and patients with a higher functioning upper limb may experience more benefits from priming iTBS. Priming iTBS may facilitate poststroke motor learning by enhancing the permissiveness of the ipsilesional sensorimotor area to therapeutic sensory modalities, such as the mirror visual feedback.
Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04034069.
Keywords: Adult
Metaplasticity
Motor cortex
Sensorimotor activation
Upper extremity
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Journal: Stroke 
ISSN: 0039-2499
EISSN: 1524-4628
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037870
Rights: © 2022 American Heart Association, Inc.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

7
Citations as of May 12, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
Citations as of May 16, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

24
Citations as of May 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.