Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/105982
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciences-
dc.creatorFang, Z-
dc.creatorLiu, G-
dc.creatorZhu, L-
dc.creatorDong, D-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-23T04:32:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-23T04:32:43Z-
dc.identifier.issn0968-6673-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/105982-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Gender, Work & Organization published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.rightsThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Fang, Zhilan, Gabriel Liu, Liling Zhu, and Dong Dong. 2023. “Doing “Gendered Exit”: Work, Care and the Moral Practices of Disabled Persons.” Gender, Work & Organization 30(5): 1571–1584 is available at https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12990.en_US
dc.subjectCareen_US
dc.subjectDisabilityen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectExit from worken_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.titleDoing “gendered exit” : work, care and the moral practices of disabled personsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1571-
dc.identifier.epage1584-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gwao.12990-
dcterms.abstractPrevious research into the exclusion of disabled persons from paid work tends to compartmentalize them into a stable and undifferentiated category of “cared-for” subjects. This fixation implicitly approves the ethics of work as the exclusive source of their dignity and citizenship. Drawing on in-depth interviews with Myasthenia Gravis patients and their families, this paper argues that a subscription to the logic of interdependence that organizes the ethics of care enables our participants to transcend the conventional carer/cared-for dichotomy. However, the patriarchal structures in which the agency of our participants finds expression create a gendered distribution of care. By delimiting the possibilities of social membership for disabled persons, this paper embraces the care ethics as an alternative to that of work. It nevertheless circumscribes care by bringing into relief its differential and contingent qualities.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationGender, work and organization, Sept 2023, v. 30, no. 5, p. 1571-1584-
dcterms.isPartOfGender, work and organization-
dcterms.issued2023-09-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85152020673-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-0432-
dc.description.validate202404 bcch-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCCen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fang_Doing_Gendered_Exit.pdf307.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

5
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.