Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/104838
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Do customers share the same perspective? A study on online OTAs ratings versus user ratings of Hong Kong hotels
Authors: Leung, R
Au, N 
Liu, J 
Law, R 
Issue Date: Apr-2018
Source: Journal of vacation marketing, Apr. 2018, v. 24, no. 2, p. 103-117
Abstract: Hotel service levels and pricing range are often denoted by the “star” rating system predominant in that country. This rating system depends considerably on travel agencies to disseminate information to consumers to assist them in their hotel selection. Given the popularity of online travel agencies (OTAs) and review websites, consumers can now compare published star and user ratings of hotels online to obtain a complete idea of the hotel service standards from the perspective of other users. This study attempted to analyze the difference among the star and user ratings published in eight popular OTAs. Findings showed that Priceline and Ctrip had the lowest website star ratings, whereas Bookings.com and Agoda had the highest for both local chain and independent hotels. A comparison of the star and user ratings indicated that Priceline, TripAdvisor, and Hotels.com had no statistical difference, but the other five OTAs exhibited statistical differences. The findings also indicated that Ctrip had higher user rating scores among the OTAs, possibly indicating that Chinese users rate hotels higher than other nationalities do.
Keywords: Expectation disconfirmation
Hong Kong hotels
OTA star rating
Rating discrepancy
User rating
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Journal: Journal of vacation marketing 
ISSN: 1356-7667
EISSN: 1479-1870
DOI: 10.1177/1356766716679483
Rights: This is the accepted version of the publication "Leung, R., Au, N., Liu, J., & Law, R. (2018). Do customers share the same perspective? A study on online OTAs ratings versus user ratings of Hong Kong hotels. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 24(2), 103-117. Copyright © 2016 (The Author(s)). DOI: 10.1177/1356766716679483.”
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Au_Do_Customers_Share.pdfPre-Published version784.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

112
Last Week
6
Last month
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

Downloads

84
Citations as of Nov 30, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

16
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.