Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103934
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: A classifier-combined method for grading breast cancer based on dempster-shafer evidence theory
Authors: Liu, Z
Lin, F
Huang, J
Wu, X
Wen, J
Wang, M
Ren, Y
Wei, X
Song, X
Qin, J 
Lee, EYP
Shao, D
Wang, Y
Cheng, X
Hu, Z
Luo, D
Zhang, N
Issue Date: 1-May-2023
Source: Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 1 May 2023, v. 13, no. 5, p. 3288-3297
Abstract: Background: Preoperative non-invasive histologic grading of breast cancer is essential. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of a machine learning classification method based on Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory for the histologic grading of breast cancer.
Methods: A total of 489 contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices with breast cancer lesions (including 171 grade I, 140 grade II, and 178 grade III lesions) were used for analysis. All the lesions were segmented by two radiologists in consensus. For each slice, the quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters based on a modified Tofts model and the textural features of the segmented lesion on the image were extracted. Principal component analysis was then used to reduce feature dimensionality and obtain new features from the pharmacokinetic parameters and texture features. The basic confidence assignments of different classifiers were combined using D-S evidence theory based on the accuracy of three classifiers: support vector machine (SVM), Random Forest, and k-nearest neighbor (KNN). The performance of the machine learning techniques was evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve.
Results: The three classifiers showed varying accuracy across different categories. The accuracy of using D-S evidence theory in combination with multiple classifiers reached 92.86%, which was higher than that of using SVM (82.76%), Random Forest (78.85%), or KNN (87.82%) individually. The average area under the curve of using the D-S evidence theory combined with multiple classifiers reached 0.896, which was larger than that of using SVM (0.829), Random Forest (0.727), or KNN (0.835) individually.
Conclusions: Multiple classifiers can be effectively combined based on D-S evidence theory to improve the prediction of histologic grade in breast cancer.
Keywords: Evidence theory
Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD)
Breast cancer
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)
Machine learning
Publisher: AME Publishing Company
Journal: Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery 
ISSN: 2223-4292
EISSN: 2223-4306
DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-652
Rights: © Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
The following publication Liu, Z., Lin, F., Huang, J., Wu, X., Wen, J., Wang, M., ... & Zhang, N. (2023). A classifier-combined method for grading breast cancer based on Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 13(5), 3288-3297 is available at https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-652.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
112966-PB8-1128-R4.pdf1.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

140
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

57
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
Citations as of Aug 22, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.