Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103906
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Ultrasound-guided dry needling versus traditional dry needling for patients with knee osteoarthritis : a double-blind randomized controlled trial
Authors: Pang, JCY
Fu, ASN 
Lam, SKH
Peng, B
Fu, ACL
Issue Date: 2022
Source: PLoS one, 2022, v. 17, no. 9, e0274990
Abstract: Objective
To compare the effect of ultrasound (US)-guided dry needling (DN) with traditional DN in the treatment of pain and dysfunction for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
Design
A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Methods
Patients (25 male and 65 female), age 50-80 years diagnosed with KOA were recruited and randomly assigned to one of three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio for intervention: real US-guided DN with exercise therapy (G1), placebo US-guided DN with exercise therapy (G2), and exercise therapy solely (G3). G1 and G2 were blinded to the application of real or placebo US guidance by turning the monitor of US imaging out-of-view from participants' vantage points. The effectiveness of blinding was evaluated by asking the participants whether they had received real-US guided DN. The responses were assessed by Chi-square test. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Knee injury, and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales (KOOS-pain, KOOS-symptoms, KOOS-quality-of-life (QoL)) were collected at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks by a blinded assessor. Data were analyzed by mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction.
Results
Eighty-four participants (61.26 +/- 5.57 years) completed the study. G1 achieved significant improvement in VAS at 8 weeks compared to G2 and G3 (G1 vs. G2: MD = -15.61, 95% CI [-25.49, -5.51], p = 0.001; G1 vs. G3: MD = -19.90, 95% CI [-29.71, -10.08], p<0.001). G1 achieved significant improvement in KOOS-pain at 8 weeks compared to G2 and G3 (G1 vs. G2: MD = 9.76, 95% CI [2.38, 17.14], p = 0.006; G1 vs. G3: MD = 9.48, 95% CI [2.31, 16.66], p = 0.010). KOOS-symptoms and KOOS-QoL were not statistically significant between groups. G2 had no significant difference of the perceptions as G1 with p = 0.128. G2 were successfully blinded to placebo US-guided DN.
Conclusion
US-guided DN with exercise therapy may be more effective than traditional DN with exercise therapy or exercise therapy alone in reduce pain of KOA.
Publisher: Public Library of Science
Journal: PLoS one 
EISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274990
Rights: © 2022 Pang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
The following publication Pang, J. C., Fu, A. S., Lam, S. K., Peng, B., & Fu, A. C. (2022). Ultrasound-guided dry needling versus traditional dry needling for patients with knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Plos one, 17(9), e0274990 is available at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274990.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0274990.pdf1.32 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

117
Last Week
4
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

56
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
Citations as of Aug 22, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

8
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.