Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103774
| Title: | Lifestyle medicine for depression : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Authors: | Wong, VWH Ho, FYY Shi, NK Sarris, J Chung, KF Yeung, WF |
Issue Date: | 1-Apr-2021 | Source: | Journal of affective disorders, 1 Apr. 2021, v. 284, p. 203-216 | Abstract: | Background: The treatment effect of multi-component LM interventions on depressive symptoms has not yet been examined. Methods: We systematically searched six databases from inception to February 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving any multi-component LM interventions (physical activity, nutritional advice, sleep management, and/or stress management) on depressive symptoms relative to care as usual (CAU), waitlist (WL), no intervention (NI), or attention control (AC) comparisons. Results: Fifty studies with 8,479 participants were included. Multi-component LM interventions reduced depressive symptoms significantly relative to the CAU (p >.001; d = 0.20) and WL/NI (p > .01; d = 0.22) comparisons at immediate posttreatment. However, no significant difference was found when compared with AC. The intervention effects were maintained in the short-term (1- to 3-month follow-up) relative to the CAU comparison (p > .05; d = 0.25), but not in the medium- and long-term. The moderator analyses examining the effect of multi-component LM interventions compared with CAU suggested that the number of lifestyle factors adopted was a significant moderator. Although disease type was not a significant moderator, there was a tendency that the clinical effect of multi-component LM interventions was stronger (d = 0.45) in those diagnosed with major depression. No publication bias was detected. Limitations: Low number of RCTs available in some subgroup analyses prevented from finding meaningful effects. Results may not be extended to major depression, because data on secondary depression were captured. Conclusion: Multi-component LM interventions appeared to be effective in mitigating depressive symptoms; however, the magnitude of the clinical effect was small. Future research is needed to assess more comprehensive and individualized LM interventions which have a greater emphasis on motivational and compliance aspects and focus solely on individuals with depression. |
Keywords: | Depression Effectiveness Lifestyle Meta-analysis Randomized controlled trial |
Publisher: | Elsevier | Journal: | Journal of affective disorders | EISSN: | 0165-0327 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.012 | Rights: | © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. © 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. The following publication Wong, V. W. H., Ho, F. Y. Y., Shi, N. K., Sarris, J., Chung, K. F., & Yeung, W. F. (2021). Lifestyle medicine for depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Affective Disorders, 284, 203-216 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.012. |
| Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yeung_Lifestyle_Medicine_Depression.pdf | Pre-Published version | 3.04 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
312
Last Week
18
18
Last month
Citations as of Apr 12, 2026
Downloads
555
Citations as of Apr 12, 2026
SCOPUSTM
Citations
74
Citations as of Apr 2, 2026
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
74
Citations as of Apr 23, 2026
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.



