Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/103774
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Lifestyle medicine for depression : a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Authors: Wong, VWH
Ho, FYY
Shi, NK
Sarris, J
Chung, KF
Yeung, WF 
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2021
Source: Journal of affective disorders, 1 Apr. 2021, v. 284, p. 203-216
Abstract: Background: The treatment effect of multi-component LM interventions on depressive symptoms has not yet been examined.
Methods: We systematically searched six databases from inception to February 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving any multi-component LM interventions (physical activity, nutritional advice, sleep management, and/or stress management) on depressive symptoms relative to care as usual (CAU), waitlist (WL), no intervention (NI), or attention control (AC) comparisons.
Results: Fifty studies with 8,479 participants were included. Multi-component LM interventions reduced depressive symptoms significantly relative to the CAU (p >.001; d = 0.20) and WL/NI (p > .01; d = 0.22) comparisons at immediate posttreatment. However, no significant difference was found when compared with AC. The intervention effects were maintained in the short-term (1- to 3-month follow-up) relative to the CAU comparison (p > .05; d = 0.25), but not in the medium- and long-term. The moderator analyses examining the effect of multi-component LM interventions compared with CAU suggested that the number of lifestyle factors adopted was a significant moderator. Although disease type was not a significant moderator, there was a tendency that the clinical effect of multi-component LM interventions was stronger (d = 0.45) in those diagnosed with major depression. No publication bias was detected.
Limitations: Low number of RCTs available in some subgroup analyses prevented from finding meaningful effects. Results may not be extended to major depression, because data on secondary depression were captured.
Conclusion: Multi-component LM interventions appeared to be effective in mitigating depressive symptoms; however, the magnitude of the clinical effect was small. Future research is needed to assess more comprehensive and individualized LM interventions which have a greater emphasis on motivational and compliance aspects and focus solely on individuals with depression.
Keywords: Depression
Effectiveness
Lifestyle
Meta-analysis
Randomized controlled trial
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Journal of affective disorders 
EISSN: 0165-0327
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.012
Rights: © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
© 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
The following publication Wong, V. W. H., Ho, F. Y. Y., Shi, N. K., Sarris, J., Chung, K. F., & Yeung, W. F. (2021). Lifestyle medicine for depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Affective Disorders, 284, 203-216 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.012.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yeung_Lifestyle_Medicine_Depression.pdfPre-Published version3.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

218
Last Week
16
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

379
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

65
Citations as of Aug 22, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

66
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.