Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/102295
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: A comparative study for determining rock joint normal stiffness with destructive uniaxial compression and nondestructive ultrasonic wave testing
Authors: Zhang, Z 
Zhu, J
Deng, J
Issue Date: Jul-2023
Source: Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering, July 2023, v. 15, no. 7, p. 1700-1712
Abstract: Rock joint a kind of vital discontinuities in natural rock mass. How to accurately and conveniently determine joint normal stiffness is therefore significant in rock mechanics. Here, first, seven existing methods for determining joint normal stiffness were introduced and reviewed, among which Method I (the indirect measurement method), Method II (the direct determination method), Method III (the across-joint strain gauge measurement method) and Method IV (the deformation measuring ring method) are via destructive uniaxial compression testing, while Method V (the best fitting method), Method VI (the rapid evaluation method) and Method VII (the effective modulus method) are through wave propagation principles and nondestructive ultrasonic testing. Subsequently, laboratory tests of intact and jointed sandstone specimens were conducted following the testing requirements and procedures of those seven methods. A comparison among those methods was then performed. The results show that Method I, i.e. the benchmark method, is reliable and stable. Method II has a conceptual drawback, and its accuracy is acceptable at only very low stress levels. Relative errors in the results from Method III are very large. With Method IV, the testing results are sufficiently accurate despite the strict testing environment and complicated testing procedures. The results from Method V are greatly unstable and significantly dependent on the natural frequency of the transducers. The joint normal stiffness determined with Method VI is stable and accurate, although data processing is complex. Method VII could be adopted to determine the joint normal stiffness corresponding to the rock elastic deformation phase only. Consequently, it is suggested that Methods I, IV and VI should be adopted for the measurement of joint normal stiffness. The findings could be helpful in selecting an appropriate method to determine joint normal stiffness and, hence, to better solve discontinuous rock mass problems.
Keywords: Normal stiffness
Rock joint
Ultrasonic wave
Uniaxial compression
Publisher: 科学出版社 (Kexue Chubanshe,Science Press)
Journal: Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering 
ISSN: 1674-7755
EISSN: 2589-0417
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.10.010
Rights: © 2023 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
The following publication Zhang, Z., Zhu, J., & Deng, J. (2023). A comparative study for determining rock joint normal stiffness with destructive uniaxial compression and nondestructive ultrasonic wave testing. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 15(7), 1700-1712 is availale at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.10.010.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S1674775522002207-main.pdf2.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

114
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

Downloads

125
Citations as of Nov 9, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Citations as of Dec 19, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
Citations as of Dec 18, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.