Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/101
Title: A comparative study of the variables in construction project briefing/ architectural programming
Authors: Yu, ATW 
Shen, GQP 
Kelly, J
Hunter, K
Keywords: Construction industry
Project management
Architecture
Best management practice
Comparative studies
Issue Date: Feb-2008
Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Source: Comparative study of the variables in construction project briefing/architectural programming, Journal of construction engineering and management, Feb. 2008, v. 134, no. 2, p. 122-138 How to cite?
Journal: Journal of construction engineering and management 
Abstract: Briefing is the process by which client requirements are identified, clarified and articulated in the early design stage of construction projects. It is crucial to the successful delivery of construction projects. Considerable research has been conducted in briefing during the past two decades. However, current briefing practices are considered inadequate by many researchers and little research has been done in sufficient depth to explore briefing variables in the construction industry. This paper introduces a comprehensive framework of the variables that have an impact on construction project briefing. A questionnaire survey was conducted to validate these variables among project managers and architects in Hong Kong, the UK and the USA. The results indicated that while there were no significant differences between the samples in the UK and the USA on the variables for construction project briefing, the views of the samples in Hong Kong deviated from the two Western countries. The Western professionals have more positive answers to most of the statements in the questionnaire. The findings have significant implications for industry practitioners to produce their guidelines for the briefing process and for the authors to draft a "how-to" briefing guide for construction projects.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/101
ISSN: 0733-9364
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:2(122)
Rights: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management © ASCE 2008. The published version in ASCE's Engineering Database at: http://cedb.asce.org/cgi/WWWdisplay.cgi?0800823.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CEM 2006 (Comparative study 05) -2nd sub.pdfPre-published version342.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of May 28, 2016

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Last Week
0
Last month
0
Citations as of May 26, 2016

Page view(s)

648
Last Week
3
Last month
Checked on May 29, 2016

Download(s)

596
Checked on May 29, 2016

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.