Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/100732
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Detailed assessment of GNSS observation noise based using zero baseline data
Authors: Zhang, H
Ji, S
Wang, Z
Chen, W 
Issue Date: 1-Nov-2018
Source: Advances in space research, 1 Nov. 2018, v. 62, no. 9, p. 2454-2466
Abstract: In this research, the GNSS observation noise is assessed in details based on zero baseline data. The 24-h observations are collected from two CORS stations of Curtin University (32.0°S, 115.9°E) on February 8, 2017. The code and carrier phase observation noise is assessed in details for every system of GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, SBAS and QZSS and for every measurement type and every satellite. In addition, the observation noise by two different kinds of receiver is also assessed and compared. From the numerical results, we find that:
(1) Among the six GNSS systems, the code noise of Galileo is the smallest, the noise of all observed Galileo code types are no more than 0.1 m and the noise of C8X is only around 1 cm; the GLONASS code noise is the biggest, the noise of code types C1C and C2C are around 0.25 m;
(2) The noise can vary greatly for different code measurement types and there is at least one code measurement type in each system with noise smaller than 0.1 m;
(3) For carrier phase, Galileo noise is slightly smaller than the other systems, the noise of all carrier phase types are smaller than 1 mm; GLONASS noise is the biggest, the noise of L2C and L2P are all bigger than 1 mm, some can reach about 1.7 mm;
(4) Generally, there is no obvious noise difference for different carrier phase measurement types of each system, except for GLONASS, of which the noise of frequency band L2 is obviously bigger than that of L1;
(5) For BeiDou, MEO and IGSO have similar carrier phase noise level, but the noise of GEO is clearly related to elevation angle, with the decrease of elevation angle, the noise will increase;
(6) The carrier phase noise of different kinds of receiver may vary greatly, in this research, the numerical results show that the noise of JAVAD receiver are generally much smaller than TRIMBLE.
Keywords: Carrier phase
Code
GNSS
Observation noise
Zero baseline
Publisher: Pergamon Press
Journal: Advances in space research 
EISSN: 0273-1177
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2018.07.023
Rights: © 2018 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
© 2018. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
The following publication Zhang, H., Ji, S., Wang, Z., & Chen, W. (2018). Detailed assessment of GNSS observation noise based using zero baseline data. Advances in Space Research, 62(9), 2454-2466 is available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2018.07.023.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chen_Detailed_Assessment_Gnss.pdfPre-Published version1.87 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

72
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

Downloads

60
Citations as of Apr 14, 2025

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

17
Citations as of Sep 12, 2025

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

9
Citations as of Oct 10, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.