Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89667
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Englishen_US
dc.creatorCummings, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-28T02:29:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-28T02:29:04Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-28512-8 (Softcover)en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-030-28513-5 (eBook)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/89667-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillanen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020en_US
dc.rightsThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of a chapter published in Fallacies in Medicine and Health. The final authenticated version is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28513-5.en_US
dc.subjectHealth communicationen_US
dc.subjectInformal fallacyen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophy of languageen_US
dc.subjectHealth discourseargumentationen_US
dc.subjectCritical thinkingen_US
dc.subjectHealth humanitiesen_US
dc.titleFallacies in medicine and health : critical thinking, argumentation and communicationen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-28513-5en_US
dcterms.abstractThis textbook examines the ways in which arguments may be used and abused in medicine and health. The central claim is that a group of arguments known as the informal fallacies – including slippery slope arguments, fear appeal, and the argument from ignorance – undertake considerable work in medical and health contexts, and that they can in fact be rationally warranted ways of understanding complex topics, contrary to the views of many earlier philosophers and logicians. Modern medicine and healthcare require lay people to engage with increasingly complex decisions in areas such as immunization, lifestyle and dietary choices, and health screening. Many of the so-called fallacies of reasoning can also be viewed as cognitive heuristics or short-cuts which help individuals make decisions in these contexts. Using features such as learning objectives, case studies and end-of-unit questions, this textbook examines topical issues and debates in all areas of medicine and health, including antibiotic use and resistance, genetic engineering, euthanasia, addiction to prescription opioids, and the legalization of cannabis. It will be useful to students of critical thinking, reasoning, logic, argumentation, rhetoric, communication, health humanities, philosophy and linguistics.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCummings, L. Fallacies in medicine and health : critical thinking, argumentation and communication. Cham: Paalgrave Macmillann, 2020en_US
dcterms.issued2020-
dc.publisher.placeChamen_US
dc.description.validate202104 bcvcen_US
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera0756-n12-
dc.identifier.SubFormID1484-
dc.description.fundingSourceSelf-fundeden_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Book
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cummings_Critical_Thinking_Medicine.pdfPre-Published version956.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

93
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

31
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.