Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/86704
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Accounting and Finance-
dc.creatorFoo, Yin Yen William-
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/8312-
dc.language.isoEnglish-
dc.titleAuditors' response to analysts' forecast properties : some evidence from audit pricing-
dc.typeThesis-
dcterms.abstractThis study draws on information asymmetry theory and audit pricing theory to examine the link between analyst earnings forecasts and audit pricing in the U.S. For the empirical tests, information asymmetry is measured in two ways: (1) the lag of analysts' forecast accuracy (LAGACCY), and (2) the lag of analysts' forecast dispersion (LAGDSP). Using data from 2000 to 2012, this thesis finds that higher analyst earnings forecast accuracy (dispersion) is associated with lower (higher) audit fees. These findings are consistent with the theory that analysts, as important financial intermediaries, provide useful information to third parties, including auditors. Further, the results suggest that these associations are stronger (1) for small firms, and (2) for younger firms, consistent with theory that such firms have higher information asymetry. Finally, it is found that the association between audit fees and LAGACCY and LAGDSP are insignificant for firms that are audited by industry specialists. This finding provides support that auditor industry specialization plays a part in reducing information asymetry with these audit firm types being less reliant on information provided by financial analysts.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
dcterms.educationLevelPh.D.-
dcterms.extent167 pages : color illustrations-
dcterms.issued2015-
dcterms.LCSHAuditing.-
dcterms.LCSHAuditors.-
dcterms.LCSHBusiness forecasting.-
dcterms.LCSHBusiness enterprises -- Finance.-
dcterms.LCSHHong Kong Polytechnic University -- Dissertations-
Appears in Collections:Thesis
Show simple item record

Page views

45
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.