Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108412
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.creatorYuen, JWMen_US
dc.creatorLam, CTCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-16T09:33:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-16T09:33:32Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108412-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectJUCen_US
dc.subjectOorganosilicon double-long-chain diquaternary quaternary ammoniumen_US
dc.subjectHand hygieneen_US
dc.subjectLong-lastingen_US
dc.subjectNano-antibacterial particlen_US
dc.titleA controlled study on the antibacterial efficacy and long-term efficacy of JUC in hand disinfectionen_US
dc.typePreprinten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.4088747en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Hand hygiene is an important way to prevent infection and transmission of many microorganisms. However, the current alcohol-based hand disinfection products have certain limitations, and the compliance of medical staff with hand hygiene is poor. JUC is a nano-scale long-acting antibacterial dressing, which is composed of 2% silicone double long chain double quaternary ammonium salt and 98% water, and is widely used as an antibacterial agent. Therefore, in order to find a potential alternative, this article investigated the efficacy and persistence of JUC in hand disinfection through a controlled study.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: Experiments designed according to European standard EN1500:1997. Comply with the detection methods and requirements, and use 60% propan-2-ol solution as the control. A total of 15 healthy volunteers were recruited to evaluate the efficacy of JUC, and 8 were tested for antimicrobial persistence. The test strain was E. coli K12 NCTC strain 10538.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: First, JUC had a similar antibacterial effect compared to 60% propan-2-ol, both reducing bacterial load by approximately 4 log10. Second, there was no significant difference in the antibacterial effect of hand rubbing and hand spraying with JUC. Third, volunteers' hand bacterial counts were still reduced by 2-3 log10 at 8 hours after a single application of JUC compared to untreated volunteers.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: JUC can effectively exert the antibacterial effect of hands, and has a long-term antibacterial protection effect of at least 8 hours.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSSRN, 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4088747en_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.description.validate202408 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAuthor’s Originalen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1425-
dc.identifier.SubFormID44938-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextIndustrial donationen_US
dc.description.pubStatusUnpublishen_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCopyright retained by authoren_US
Appears in Collections:Other
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yuen_Controlled_Study_Antibacterial.pdfPreprint version553.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Author’s Original
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

35
Citations as of Dec 22, 2024

Downloads

6
Citations as of Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.