Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/108412
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.creatorYuen, JWMen_US
dc.creatorLam, CTCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-16T09:33:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-16T09:33:32Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/108412-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the author.en_US
dc.subjectJUCen_US
dc.subjectOorganosilicon double-long-chain diquaternary quaternary ammoniumen_US
dc.subjectHand hygieneen_US
dc.subjectLong-lastingen_US
dc.subjectNano-antibacterial particlen_US
dc.titleA controlled study on the antibacterial efficacy and long-term efficacy of JUC in hand disinfectionen_US
dc.typePreprinten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.4088747en_US
dcterms.abstractBackground: Hand hygiene is an important way to prevent infection and transmission of many microorganisms. However, the current alcohol-based hand disinfection products have certain limitations, and the compliance of medical staff with hand hygiene is poor. JUC is a nano-scale long-acting antibacterial dressing, which is composed of 2% silicone double long chain double quaternary ammonium salt and 98% water, and is widely used as an antibacterial agent. Therefore, in order to find a potential alternative, this article investigated the efficacy and persistence of JUC in hand disinfection through a controlled study.en_US
dcterms.abstractMethods: Experiments designed according to European standard EN1500:1997. Comply with the detection methods and requirements, and use 60% propan-2-ol solution as the control. A total of 15 healthy volunteers were recruited to evaluate the efficacy of JUC, and 8 were tested for antimicrobial persistence. The test strain was E. coli K12 NCTC strain 10538.en_US
dcterms.abstractResults: First, JUC had a similar antibacterial effect compared to 60% propan-2-ol, both reducing bacterial load by approximately 4 log10. Second, there was no significant difference in the antibacterial effect of hand rubbing and hand spraying with JUC. Third, volunteers' hand bacterial counts were still reduced by 2-3 log10 at 8 hours after a single application of JUC compared to untreated volunteers.en_US
dcterms.abstractConclusions: JUC can effectively exert the antibacterial effect of hands, and has a long-term antibacterial protection effect of at least 8 hours.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSSRN, 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4088747en_US
dcterms.issued2022-
dc.description.validate202408 bcrcen_US
dc.description.oaAuthor’s Originalen_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumbera1425-
dc.identifier.SubFormID44938-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextIndustrial donationen_US
dc.description.pubStatusUnpublishen_US
dc.description.oaCategoryCopyright retained by authoren_US
Appears in Collections:Other
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yuen_Controlled_Study_Antibacterial.pdfPreprint version553.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Author’s Original
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

58
Citations as of Apr 1, 2025

Downloads

15
Citations as of Apr 1, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.