Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89367
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
Title: Affective and discursive outcomes of symbolic interpretations in picture-based counseling : a skin conductance and discourse analytic study
Authors: Tay, D 
Huang, J 
Zeng, H 
Issue Date: 2019
Source: Metaphor and symbol, 2019, v. 34, no. 2, p. 96-110
Abstract: The relationship between symbolic expression and affect tends to be investigated from the perspective of recipients in contexts like media, politics, and advertising. A more producer-centric context is picture-based counseling (PBC) where clients are prompted by counselors to interpret pictures creatively as part of the treatment process. Nevertheless, the affective and discursive outcomes of these interpretations remain poorly understood. This paper reports a combined experimental and discourse analytic study which compares prompting strategies in terms of affective engagement, contrasts the discourse characteristics of interpretations following “topic-present” and “topic-absent” prompting strategies, and offers potential implications for PBC practice. Analysis of skin conductance levels suggests that the two prompting strategies which invite symbolic interpretation are more affectively engaging than the literal control (F(2,32) = 6.356, p =.005), but not significantly different from each other. A follow-up discourse analysis revealed the prominence of metaphors in symbolic interpretations, as well as nuanced differences between the discourse outcomes of prompting strategies. Topic-present interpretations tended to produce more systematic ensembles of metaphorical expressions, while topic-absent interpretations were less systematic. The combined findings suggest that orienting clients towards symbolic interpretation is affectively engaging, but the ideal prompting strategy is best determined by context-specific circumstances to be judged by counselors.
Publisher: Psychology Press
Journal: Metaphor and symbol 
ISSN: 1092-6488
EISSN: 1532-7868
DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2019.1611724
Rights: © 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Metaphor and Symbol on 15 May 2019 (online), available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10926488.2019.1611724.
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a0611-n06_Manuscript_revised.pdfPre-Published version861.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

14
Citations as of May 15, 2022

Downloads

9
Citations as of May 15, 2022

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Citations as of May 20, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
Citations as of May 19, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.