Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/89324
Title: Reliability and validity of ultrasound elastography for evaluating muscle stiffness in neurological populations : a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Miller, T 
Ying, M 
Tsang, CSL 
Huang, M 
Pang, MYC 
Issue Date: Jan-2021
Source: Physical therapy, Jan. 2021, v. 101, no. 1, pzaa188, https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa188
Abstract: Objective: Ultrasound elastography is an emerging diagnostic technology used to investigate the biomechanical properties of the musculoskeletal system. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the psychometric properties of ultrasound elastography techniques for evaluating muscle stiffness in people with neurological conditions.
Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library databases was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using software, reviewers independently screened citations for inclusion. Peer-reviewed studies that evaluated in vivo muscle stiffness in people with neurological conditions and reported relevant psychometric properties were considered for inclusion. Twenty-one articles were included for final review. Data relevant to measurement technique, site, and neurological condition were extracted. The Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments checklist was used to rate the methodological quality of included studies. The level of evidence for specific measurement outcomes was determined using a best-evidence synthesis approach.
Results: Reliability varied across populations, ultrasound systems, and assessment conditions (ie, joint/body positions, active/passive muscle conditions, probe orientation), with most studies indicating moderate to good reliability (ICC = 0.5–0.9, n = 13). Meta-analysis results showed a good overall correlation across studies (r = 0.78, 95% confidence interval = 0.64–0.86), with no between-group difference based on population (Q1 = 0.00). Convergent validity was demonstrated by strong correlations between stiffness values and measures of spasticity (n = 5), functional motor recovery or impairment (n = 5), and grayscale or color histogram pixel intensities (n = 3). Discriminant or known-groups validity was also established for multiple studies and indicated either significant between-group differences in stiffness values (n = 12) or within-group differences between more and less affected limbs (n = 6). Responsiveness was observed in all intervention studies reporting posttreatment stiffness changes (n = 6).
Conclusions: Overall, ultrasound elastography techniques showed moderate reliability in evaluating in vivo muscle stiffness, good convergent validity with relevant clinical assessments, and good divergent validity in discriminating tissue changes within and between groups.
Impact: Ultrasound elastography has clinical utility in assessing muscle stiffness, monitoring its temporal changes, and measuring the response to intervention in people with neurological conditions.
Keywords: Ultrasonography
Neurology
Measurement: applied
Stroke
Cerebral Palsy
Muscular Dystrophies
Parkinson Disease
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Journal: Physical therapy 
ISSN: 0031-9023
EISSN: 1538-6724
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa188
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Open Access Information
Status embargoed access
Embargo End Date 2022-01-31
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page views

55
Citations as of May 15, 2022

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
Citations as of May 12, 2022

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

3
Citations as of May 19, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.