Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/93584
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Aeronautical and Aviation Engineeringen_US
dc.creatorZhang, Hen_US
dc.creatorJiang, Yen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-14T01:45:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-14T01:45:41Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-936406-27-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/93584-
dc.description2021 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, January 25 - 28, 2021, onlineen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Navigationen_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission of the author.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © (2021) by Institute of Navigationen_US
dc.rightsAll rights reserved.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Zhang, Hengwei, Jiang, Yiping, "Nominal Range Error Analysis of BDS for ARAIM," Proceedings of the 2021 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, January 2021, pp. 201-211 is first published by the Institute of Navigation and is available at https://doi.org/10.33012/2021.17813.en_US
dc.titleNominal range error analysis of BDS for ARAIMen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage201en_US
dc.identifier.epage211en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33012/2021.17813en_US
dcterms.abstractThe Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM) requires a minimum performance level of the satellite constellation that is used for aircraft navigation. The distribution of the satellite Signal-In-Space (SIS) range error needs to be sufficiently characterized considering the correlation in error terms. The nominal range error for 14 BDS-2 and 11 BDS-3 satellites and the correlation of orbit and clock errors are analyzed based on one-year data of broadcast and precise ephemerides. Results show significant differences in the nominal range error performance among three different types of satellites of GEO, IGSO and MEO and different manufacturers. The service history is broken down into monthly dataset to analyze the variation of single satellite performance and BDS-2 is compared with BDS-3 from multiple aspects. The URE is characterized and one-sigma value is 9.4m, 5.8m and 4.9m for GEO, IGSO and MEO, respectively. Based on the correlation analysis, orbit error components show significant disparity in the harmonic period between satellite types. Like orbit error components, the large difference also exists in clock error regarding convergence time. Independent sampling interval is estimated with the time interval ranging from 44 to 67, 14 to 15 and 11 to 12 hours for GEO, IGSO and MEO, respectively.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationIn proceedings of the 2021 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, January 25-28 , 2021, p. 201-211en_US
dcterms.issued2021-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85104181740-
dc.relation.ispartofbookProceedings of the 2021 International Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigation, January 25-28, 2021en_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Technical Meeting of The Institute of Navigationen_US
dc.description.validate202207 bckwen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberAAE-0060, a1253en_US
dc.identifier.SubFormID44374-
dc.description.fundingSourceOthersen_US
dc.description.fundingTextNational Natural Science Foundation of Chinaen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zhang_Nominal_Range_Error.pdf1.83 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

58
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Downloads

50
Citations as of May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.