Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88913
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics-
dc.creatorXu, QX-
dc.creatorShi, WZ-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-11T02:42:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-11T02:42:28Z-
dc.identifier.issn1682-1750-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88913-
dc.description22nd Congress of the International-Society-for-Photogrammetry-and-Remote-Sensing, Aug 25-Sep 01, 2012, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Congress for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensingen_US
dc.rights© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Xu, Q. X. and Shi, W. Z.: A COMPARISON OF SEMANTIC SIMILARITY MODELS IN EVALUATING CONCEPT SIMILARITY, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XXXIX-B2, 173–178, 2012 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B2-173-2012en_US
dc.subjectSemantic similarityen_US
dc.subjectConcept similarityen_US
dc.subjectGeometric modelen_US
dc.subjectFeature modelen_US
dc.subjectNetwork modelen_US
dc.subjectTransformational modelen_US
dc.titleA comparison of semantic similarity models in evaluating concept similarityen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage173-
dc.identifier.epage178-
dc.identifier.volumeXXXIX-B2-
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B2-173-2012-
dcterms.abstractThe semantic similarities are important in concept definition, recognition, categorization, interpretation, and integration. Many semantic similarity models have been established to evaluate semantic similarities of objects or/and concepts. To find out the suitability and performance of different models in evaluating concept similarities, we make a comparison of four main types of models in this paper: the geometric model, the feature model, the network model, and the transformational model. Fundamental principles and main characteristics of these models are introduced and compared firstly. Land use and land cover concepts of NLCD92 are employed as examples in the case study. The results demonstrate that correlations between these models are very high for a possible reason that all these models are designed to simulate the similarity judgement of human mind.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, 1 Aug. 2012, v. XXXIX-B2, p. 173-178-
dcterms.isPartOfInternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences-
dcterms.issued2012-08-01-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000358210100031-
dc.relation.conferenceCongress of the International-Society-for-Photogrammetry-and-Remote-Sensing-
dc.identifier.eissn2194-9034-
dc.description.validate202101 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Scopus/WOSen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Xu_Semantic_Similarity_Models.pdf682.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

85
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

29
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.