Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/88035
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Services Engineering-
dc.creatorLai, JHK-
dc.creatorYuen, PL-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-09T00:55:01Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-09T00:55:01Z-
dc.identifier.isbn978-962-367-821-6-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/88035-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsPosted with permission.en_US
dc.subjectFacilityen_US
dc.subjectHealthcareen_US
dc.subjectHospitalen_US
dc.subjectKPIen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.titleIdentifying key performance indicators for facilities management in hospital buildingsen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage3277-
dc.identifier.epage3286-
dcterms.abstractQuality health services entail not only competent healthcare professionals but also effective management of the underpinning facilities. Realizing the importance of quality facilities management (FM) services for hospital buildings, research in this area has grown. But the absence of a credible, scientific method for systematic evaluation of hospital FM performance remains a live issue. Intended to develop such a method, a multi-stage research project has commenced. At the first stage of the project, as reported in this article, a review of relevant literature was conducted to identify indicators that are applicable to assessing hospital FM performance. The 61 indicators identified fall into 6 aspects: financial, physical, safety, patience experience, environmental, and functional. Using the phase-hierarchy (P-H) model, which is a 2-dimensional matrix comprising three phases (input, process and output) of facilities services delivery and three hierarchical FM levels (operational, tactical and strategic), the safety indicators were systematically classified. The majority of them, for measuring the output of a facilities services delivery process, are useful to FM practitioners at the strategic and tactical levels. This method, to be used for classifying the indicators in the remaining aspects, can also be applied to similar future studies on key performance indicators (KPIs).-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationProceedings of the CIB World Building Congress 2019 : Constructing Smart Cities, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, 17-21 June, 2019, p. [3277-3286] (online version)-
dcterms.issued2019-
dc.relation.conferenceCIB World Building Congress-
dc.description.validate202009 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_Othersen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lai_Key_Performance_Indicators.pdf192.1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

292
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

212
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.