Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/87712
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Building and Real Estate | en_US |
dc.creator | Xiang, L | en_US |
dc.creator | Tan, Y | en_US |
dc.creator | Jin, X | en_US |
dc.creator | Shen, G | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-30T09:10:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-30T09:10:23Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0969-9988 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/87712 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Emerald Group Publishing Limited | en_US |
dc.rights | © Emerald Publishing Limited. This AAM is provided for your own personal use only. It may not be used for resale, reprinting, systematic distribution, emailing, or for any other commercial purpose without the permission of the publisher. | en US |
dc.rights | The following publication Xiang, L., Tan, Y., Jin, X. and Shen, G. (2021), "Understanding stakeholders' concerns of age-friendly communities at the briefing stage: a preliminary study in urban China", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 31-54 is published by Emerald and is available at https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0070 | en US |
dc.subject | Age-friendly community (AFC) | en_US |
dc.subject | Briefing stage | en_US |
dc.subject | Critical factor (CF) | en_US |
dc.subject | Focus group discussion | en_US |
dc.subject | Social network analysis (SNA) | en_US |
dc.subject | Stakeholder | en_US |
dc.title | Understanding stakeholders' concerns of age-friendly communities at the briefing stage : a preliminary study in urban China | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 31 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 54 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0070 | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Purpose - This study aims to identify the stakeholders and critical factors (CFs) of promoting age-friendly communities (AFCs), discuss the relationship between the stakeholders and CFs and develop a preliminary framework for the briefing stage of promoting AFCs in urban China. | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Design/methodology/approach - Stakeholders and CFs were identified through literature review and document analysis. The Delphi method was used to screen the extracted stakeholders and CFs. The focus group methodology was applied to obtain evaluation matrices of relationships between stakeholders and CFs. A two-mode social network was formed to analyse the evaluation matrices generated. | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Findings - Results of the analyses indicate that local governments and policymaking institutions, together with project investors, obtained high prioritisations in the stakeholders' group, whilst senior citizens and caregivers appear to rank last. For CFs, communities' environmental factors receive the most attention from stakeholders. | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Research limitations/implications - Results of the analyses can only show similarities of the participating stakeholders' opinions on their concerns, and provide researchers and practitioners with initial ideas on analysing stakeholders and CFs at the briefing stage of promoting AFCs. For a specific project, the concerns and prioritisations would change. Diverse voices are necessary and case studies are in need. | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Practical implications - Challenges in promoting AFCs in urban China are discussed, and a preliminary framework of the briefing stage is developed for practitioners to follow when promoting AFCs. | en_US |
dcterms.abstract | Originality/value - This study discusses which CFs should be considered priorities and what consensuses are generally reached by stakeholders. CFs are utilised to interpret stakeholders' relationships, influences and concerns on AFC projects when conducting the social network analysis (SNA). | en_US |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Engineering, construction and architectural management, 14 July 2020, v. 28, no. 1, p. 31-54 | en_US |
dcterms.isPartOf | Engineering, construction and architectural management | en_US |
dcterms.issued | 2020-07-14 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1365-232X | en_US |
dc.description.validate | 202007 bcrc | en_US |
dc.description.oa | Accepted Manuscript | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | a0453-n01 | - |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
a0453_n01.pdf | Pre-Published version | 1.17 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
156
Last Week
2
2
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024
Downloads
123
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
8
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
8
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.