Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLu, Haitian (AF)en_US
dc.contributor.authorLei, Zhenen_US
dc.description156 pages : color illustrationsen_US
dc.descriptionPolyU Library Call No.: [THS] LG51 .H577P AF 2019 Leien_US
dc.description.abstractThis study introduces a novel ex-ante securities litigation risk proxy based on federal district courts' dismissal rates (hereafter "court dismissal rate") and explores how heterogenous pleading standards among the U.S. federal district courts affect headquartering firms' disclosure and bank loan pattern. Constructed as the number of cases dismissed in the recent years scaled by that of cases filed in the same period, court dismissal rate has a strong predictive power over the likelihood of sued firms headquartering in the jurisdiction passing the motion-to-dismissal process, indicating that historical court dismissal information can be used to predict future litigation outcomes and can be easily obtained by managers to form headquartering firms' perception on the pleading standard (stringency) of district courts. Using this measure of ex-ante litigation risk, firstly, I find robust evidence that misreporting firms headquartered in lenient court jurisdictions are more likely to make voluntary restatements, confirming the defensive disclosure hypothesis that firms in stringent legal environment are more likely to hide misbehaviors in fear of litigation cost. Secondly, interest rates are significantly lower for the firms headquartered in lenient court jurisdictions. The effect is stronger when borrowers have less information asymmetry issues and diminishes after the Supreme Court's Tellabs decision that homogenizes court pleading standards. These results indicate that lenders consider the benefit of high pleading standard in curtailing frivolous lawsuits to outweigh the cost of financial misreporting incentives. Finally, I find firms headquartered in stringent courts have annual reports with higher readability. This study contributes to the literature on (1) measurement of ex-ante litigation risk and (2) the impact of litigation risk on corporate disclosure and finance.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSchool of Accounting and Financeen_US
dc.publisherThe Hong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.rightsAll rights reserved.en_US
dc.subjectActions and defensesen_US
dc.subjectBusiness enterprises -- Law and legislation -- United Statesen_US
dc.subjectBusiness enterprises -- Finance -- Law and legislation -- United Statesen_US
dc.titleThe impact of perceived litigation risk : evidences from the U.S. federal district courten_US
dc.description.degreePh.D., School of Accounting and Finance, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2019en_US
Appears in Collections:Thesis
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
991022287147203411_link.htmFor PolyU Users168 BHTMLView/Open
991022287147203411_pira.pdfFor All Users (Non-printable)1.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Contents

Page view(s)

Citations as of Feb 19, 2020


Citations as of Feb 19, 2020

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.