Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorAbeydeera, LHUW-
dc.creatorMesthrige, JW-
dc.creatorSamarasinghalage, TI-
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (
dc.rightsThe following publication Willhelm Abeydeera LHU, Wadu Mesthrige J, Samarasinghalage TI. Perception of Embodied Carbon Mitigation Strategies: The Case of Sri Lankan Construction Industry. Sustainability. 2019; 11(11):3030, is available at
dc.subjectEmbodied carbon emissionsen_US
dc.subjectMitigation strategiesen_US
dc.subjectOperational carbon emissionen_US
dc.subjectSri Lankaen_US
dc.titlePerception of embodied carbon mitigation strategies : the case of Sri Lankan construction industryen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dcterms.abstractWhilst operational carbon (OC) emission reduction has received greater attention in the literature, embodied carbon (EC) emission reduction aspect has been largely neglected. This is particularly seen in developing countries. This study assessed the awareness and perception of carbon emission in general and EC emission reduction strategies in particular in the Sri Lankan construction industry. A detailed questionnaire, based on a comprehensive literature review, was developed to assess the awareness and perception of the Sri Lankan construction professionals about global carbon emissions, OC emissions, and EC emissions and carbon mitigation strategies. Based on a sample of 111 professionals in the construction sector, results revealed that the Sri Lankan construction professionals have poor awareness about carbon emission, especially about EC emission and EC mitigation strategies. The results further revealed that they are more concerned about the OC emission reduction than the EC emission reduction. The results suggest that they are basically aware of some basic/conventional mitigation strategies such as better design (low-carbon), an extension of building life and refurbishment of existing buildings and carbon tax, but their awareness of recently introduced micro-level technologies/strategies is significantly poor. Findings are a clear reflection of the current situation in many developing countries with regard to carbon emission and mitigation strategies. It was found that a major reason for low awareness was related to the culture: The majority of the respondents believed that actions to reduce carbon footprint should be initiated and handled by the government and other authorities, but not by construction professionals.-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSustainability, 2019, v. 11, no. 11, 3030-
dc.description.validate201908 bcma-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abeydeera_Perception_embodied_carbon.pdf826.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text

Page view(s)

Citations as of Jul 7, 2020


Citations as of Jul 7, 2020

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.