Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/80630
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
dc.creatorKwan, RLC-
dc.creatorLu, S-
dc.creatorChoi, HMC-
dc.creatorKloth, LC-
dc.creatorCheing, GLY-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-23T08:16:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-23T08:16:36Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/80630-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMolecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)en_US
dc.rights© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Kwan R -C, Lu S, Choi H -C, Kloth LC, Cheing G -Y. Efficacy of Biophysical Energies on Healing of Diabetic Skin Wounds in Cell Studies and Animal Experimental Models: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(2):368 is available at https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020368en_US
dc.subjectBiophysical energiesen_US
dc.subjectCellen_US
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitusen_US
dc.subjectExperimental modelsen_US
dc.subjectSkin woundsen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of biophysical energies on healing of diabetic skin wounds in cell studies and animal experimental models : a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ijms20020368en_US
dcterms.abstractWe have systematically assessed published cell studies and animal experimental reports on the efficacy of selected biophysical energies (BPEs) in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. These BPEs include electrical stimulation (ES), pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF), extracorporeal shockwave (ECSW), photo energies and ultrasound (US). Databases searched included CINAHL, MEDLINE and PubMed from 1966 to 2018. Studies reviewed include animal and cell studies on treatment with BPEs compared with sham, control or other BPEs. Information regarding the objective measures of tissue healing and data was extracted. Eighty-two studies were eventually selected for the critical appraisal: five on PEMF, four each on ES and ECSW, sixty-six for photo energies, and three about US. Based on the percentage of original wound size affected by the BPEs, both PEMF and low-level laser therapy (LLL) demonstrated a significant clinical benefit compared to the control or sham treatment, whereas the effect of US did not reveal a significance. Our results indicate potential benefits of selected BPEs in diabetic wound management. However, due to the heterogeneity of the current clinical trials, comprehensive studies using well-designed trials are warranted to confirm the results.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of molecular sciences, 2019, v. 20, no. 2, 368-
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of molecular sciences-
dcterms.issued2019-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85060169818-
dc.identifier.pmid30654555-
dc.identifier.eissn1422-0067en_US
dc.identifier.artn368en_US
dc.description.validate201904 bcmaen_US
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kwan_Efficacy_biophysical_energies.pdf799.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

116
Last Week
2
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

82
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

11
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.