Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/80231
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering-
dc.creatorHuo, JG-
dc.creatorWang, ZX-
dc.creatorChan, FTS-
dc.creatorLee, CKM-
dc.creatorStrandhagen, JO-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30T09:14:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-30T09:14:20Z-
dc.identifier.issn1024-123X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/80231-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2018 JiageHuo et al.This is an open access article distributed under the Creative CommonsAttribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Huo, J.G., Wang, Z.X., Chan, F.T.S., Lee, C.K.M., & Strandhagen, J.O. (2018). Assembly line balancing based on beam ant colony optimisation. Mathematical problems in engineering, 2481435, 1-17 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/2481435en_US
dc.titleAssembly line balancing based on beam ant colony optimisationen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage17-
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2018/2481435-
dcterms.abstractWe use a hybrid approach which executes ant colony algorithm in combination with beam search (ACO-BS) to solve the Simple Assembly Line Balancing Problem (SALBP). The objective is to minimise the number of workstations for a given fixed cycle time, in order to improve the solution quality and speed up the searching process. The results of 269 benchmark instances show that 95.54% of the problems can reach their optimal solutions within 360 CPU time seconds. In addition, we choose order strength and time variability as indicators to measure the complexity of the SALBP instances and then generate 27 instances with a total of 400 tasks (the problem size being much larger than that of the largest benchmark instance) randomly, with the order strength at 0.2, 0.6 and 0.9 three levels and the time variability at 5-15, 65-75, and 135-145 levels. However, the processing times are generated following a unimodal or a bimodal distribution. The comparison results with solutions obtained by priority rule show that ACO-BS makes significant improvements on the quality of the best solutions.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMathematical problems in engineering, 2018, 2481435, p. 1-17-
dcterms.isPartOfMathematical problems in engineeringprint+eissn-
dcterms.issued2018-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000447460400001-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85055324709-
dc.identifier.eissn1563-5147-
dc.identifier.artn2481435-
dc.description.validate201901 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Huo_Line_Balancing_Ant.pdf1.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

124
Last Week
3
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

90
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.