Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/79733
Title: Changing proxies for evaluating research performance: what matters to university programme heads?
Authors: Tung, VWS 
Law, R 
Chon, K 
Keywords: Performance evaluation
Research productivity
Publication
Authorship
Citations
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Centre for Tourism Research & Development
Source: Tourism recreation research, 2018, v. 43, no. 3, p. 346-355 How to cite?
Journal: Tourism recreation research 
Abstract: The tourism and hospitality research and publishing landscape have faced radical changes over the last decade. As a result, there have been calls for more holistic approaches for evaluating an academic's research performance. Yet, updated research on the perceptions of what constitutes 'good' research performance remain under-studied. To address this gap, the objective of this study is to examine how current university programme heads in tourism and hospitality evaluate and define 'good' research performance. In doing so, this study offers insights to academics on how the goal posts are indeed shifting for performance evaluation, and provides information for programme heads to assess the relative salience of their own research targets.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/79733
ISSN: 0250-8281
EISSN: 2320-0308
DOI: 10.1080/02508281.2017.1415654
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Jan 5, 2019

Page view(s)

5
Citations as of Jan 14, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.