Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/78585
Title: Competitiveness prioritisation of container ports in Asia under the background of China's Belt and Road initiative
Authors: Ren, JZ 
Dong, L
Sun, L
Keywords: Competitiveness
Port
Multi-attribute decision analysis
Interval AHP
Projection method
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Source: Transport reviews, 2018, v. 38, no. 4, p. 436-456 How to cite?
Journal: Transport reviews 
Abstract: The understanding of the competitiveness of different ports under the background of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is critical for drafting appropriate plans and taking suitable actions to select the best port in the logistics supply chains. A novel Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis (MADA) was proposed for the evaluation of port competitiveness. In the developed MADA method, the interval Analytic Hierarchy Process and the projection method was combined for the evaluation of port competitiveness. Three container ports in Asia including Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Singapore were studied under the background of China's BRI. The results demonstrate that the port of Singapore is the most competitive at the initial stage of China's BRI, followed by Hong Kong and Shanghai in the descending order. The results were validated by sum weighted method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution method, and sensitivity analysis was also carried out. The competitiveness of the three ports in the next ten years were also studied with the consideration of the influences of China's BRI, and the results reveal that Shanghai port can even exceed Hong Kong port and Singapore port if it can effectively take the advantage s of China's BRI.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/78585
ISSN: 0144-1647
EISSN: 1464-5327
DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2018.1451407
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

10
Citations as of Dec 3, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.