Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Quality of life measurements
Authors: Cummins, RA
Lau, ALD
Keywords: Homeostasis
Quality of life
Scale sensitivity
Sexual function
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Source: Cummins, RA & Lau, ALD (Eds.). Supportive care for the urology patient. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 How to cite?
Abstract: Quality of life measurement within the medical context takes a very different approach from that adopted by the social sciences. Within medicine, the construct is referred to as health-related quality of life (HRQOL) which relies heavily on measuring symptoms of ill-health. Within the social sciences, quality of life is conceptualized as a global construct, positive in nature, encompassing, but not limited by health. This chapter contrasts these two views. It is evident that these are serious issues concerning measurement of HRQOL, to the extent that the instruments may not be regarded as valid measures of quality of life as the term is generally understood. The global measures of subjective well-being, while valid and theoretically embedded, are also limited by their relative insensitivity to medical health. The reason for this insensitivity is proposed to be a homeostatic system that normally maintains subjective quality of life within a narrow positive range.
ISBN: 9780191730344
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198529415.003.0002
Appears in Collections:Book

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Checked on Sep 24, 2017

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.