Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/77668
Title: A new simplified Hypothesis B method for calculating the consolidation settlement of ground improved by vertical drains
Authors: Feng, WQ 
Yin, JH 
Keywords: Consolidation settlement
Creep
Hypothesis B
Ramp loading
Simplified method
Vertical drain
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
Source: International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics, 2018, v. 42, no. 2, p. 295-311 How to cite?
Journal: International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics 
Abstract: Vertical drains are widely used in soft ground improvements to accelerate the consolidation process. This paper develops a new simplified Hypothesis B method for calculating the consolidation settlement of a soil layer improved by vertical drains under the instant and ramp loadings. As a comparison, the traditional Hypothesis A method is also used to calculate the settlement. Then, a fully coupled finite element consolidation analysis is utilized to examine and verify this simplified method and Hypothesis A method. For the instant loading, Carrillo-Barron method and Zhu-Yin method are used to obtain the average degree of consolidation for vertical drain system. Typical parameters, such as over-consolidation ratio (OCR), smear zone, and space ratio of vertical drains, are considered. It is found that the calculation results from the new simplified method in this study agree well with finite element simulations, and relative errors are in the range of 0.1% to 12.3%. Comparatively, there are obvious differences between the calculated results from Hypothesis A method and finite element results. Carrillo-Olson method and Zhu-Yin method are utilized to obtain the average degree of consolidation for the vertical drain system to consider the ramp loading. Equivalent time is determined from half of the construction period to calculate the creep compression under the ramp loading. The accuracy of this simplified Hypothesis B method using both Carrillo-Olson method and Zhu-Yin method is acceptable with the relative errors less than 9.4%.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/77668
ISSN: 0363-9061
EISSN: 1096-9853
DOI: 10.1002/nag.2743
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Citations as of Sep 11, 2018

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Sep 18, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.