Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/77472
Title: Cost-effectiveness of a transitional home-based palliative care program for patients with end-stage heart failure
Authors: Wong, FKY 
So, C
Ng, AYM 
Lam, PT
Ng, JSC
Ng, NHY
Chau, J
Sham, MMK
Keywords: Cost-effectiveness
Heart failure
Home care services
Palliative care
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Source: Palliative medicine, 2018, v. 32, no. 2, p. 476-484 How to cite?
Journal: Palliative medicine 
Abstract: Background: Studies have shown positive clinical outcomes of specialist palliative care for end-stage heart failure patients, but cost-effectiveness evaluation is lacking. Aim: To examine the cost-effectiveness of a transitional home-based palliative care program for patients with end-stage heart failure patients as compared to the customary palliative care service. Design: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial (Trial number: NCT02086305). The costs included pre-program training, intervention, and hospital use. Quality of life was measured using SF-6D. Setting/participants: The study took place in three hospitals in Hong Kong. The inclusion criteria were meeting clinical indicators for end-stage heart failure patients including clinician-judged last year of life, discharged to home within the service area, and palliative care referral accepted. A total of 84 subjects (study = 43, control = 41) were recruited. Results: When the study group was compared to the control group, the net incremental quality-adjusted life years gain was 0.0012 (28 days)/0.0077 (84 days) and the net incremental costs per case was −HK$7935 (28 days)/−HK$26,084 (84 days). The probability of being cost-effective was 85% (28 days)/100% (84 days) based on the cost-effectiveness thresholds recommended both by National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (£20,000/quality-adjusted life years) and World Health Organization (Hong Kong gross domestic product/capita in 2015, HK$328117). Conclusion: Results suggest that a transitional home-based palliative care program is more cost-effective than customary palliative care service. Limitations of the study include small sample size, study confined to one city, clinic consultation costs, and societal costs including patient costs and unpaid care-giving costs were not included.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/77472
ISSN: 0269-2163
EISSN: 1477-030X
DOI: 10.1177/0269216317706450
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Citations as of Sep 11, 2018

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Citations as of Sep 18, 2018

Page view(s)

1
Citations as of Sep 18, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.