Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/75876
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Physics-
dc.creatorWang, WY-
dc.creatorCui, YX-
dc.creatorFung, KH-
dc.creatorZhang, Y-
dc.creatorJi, T-
dc.creatorHao, YY-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-10T02:54:49Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-10T02:54:49Z-
dc.identifier.issn1556-276X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/75876-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Wang, W. Y., Cui, Y. X., Fung, K. H., Zhang, Y., Ji, T., & Hao, Y. Y. (2017). Comparison of nanohole-type and nanopillar-type patterned metallic electrodes incorporated in organic solar cells. Nanoscale Research Letters, 12, 538, 1-9 is available at https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s11671-017-2310-7en_US
dc.subjectSurface plasmonsen_US
dc.subjectAbsorptionen_US
dc.subjectOrganic solar cellsen_US
dc.subjectResonanceen_US
dc.subjectGratingsen_US
dc.titleComparison of nanohole-type and nanopillar-type patterned metallic electrodes incorporated in organic solar cellsen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.epage9-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s11671-017-2310-7-
dcterms.abstractBoth the nanohole- and nanopillar-type patterned metallic electrodes (PMEs) have been introduced in organic solar cells (OSCs) for improving device performances experimentally, but there is few work addressing the similarities and differences between them. In this theoretical work, we systematically compare the impact of the nanohole- and nanopillar-type PMEs on the performance of an OSC based on hybridized cavity resonances. By optimizing the geometrical parameters of each PME, we obtained an interesting result that the integrated absorption efficiencies in the active layer with different optimized PMEs are almost the same (both are equal to 82.4%), outperforming that of the planar control by 9.9%. Though the absorption enhancement spectra of the two different optimal devices are similar as well, the mechanisms of light trapping at the corresponding enhancement peaks are distinct from each other. In a comprehensive view, the nanopillar-type PME is suggested to be applied in the present system, since its optimal design has a moderate filling ratio, which is much easier to fabricate than its counterpart. This work could contribute to the development of high-efficiency OSCs.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNanoscale research letters, 2017, v. 12, 538, p. 1-9-
dcterms.isPartOfNanoscale research letters-
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000411215000003-
dc.identifier.pmid28929451-
dc.identifier.eissn1556-276X-
dc.identifier.artn538-
dc.description.validate201805 bcrc-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Wang_Nanohole-Type_Nanopillar-Type_Patterned.pdf1.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

147
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

90
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.