Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/74833
Title: Negative transfer effects between reference memory and working memory training in the water maze in C57BL/6 mice
Authors: Serrano Sponton, LE
Soria, GJ
Dubroqua, S
Singer, P
Feldon, J
Gargiulo, PA
Yee, BK 
Keywords: Mouse
Spatial learning
Transfer effect
Water maze
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Source: Behavioural brain research, 2018, v. 339, p. 286-296 How to cite?
Journal: Behavioural brain research 
Abstract: The water maze is one of the most widely employed spatial learning paradigms in the cognitive profiling of genetically modified mice. Oftentimes, tests of reference memory (RM) and working memory (WM) in the water maze are sequentially evaluated in the same animals. However, critical difference in the rules governing efficient escape from the water between WM and RM tests is expected to promote the adoption of incompatible mnemonic or navigational strategies. Hence, performance in a given test is likely poorer if it follows the other test instead of being conducted first. Yet, the presence of such negative transfer effects (or proactive interference) between WM and RM training in the water maze is often overlooked in the literature. To gauge whether this constitutes a serious concern, the present study determined empirically the magnitude, persistence, and directionality of the transfer effect in wild-type C57BL/6 mice. We contrasted the order of tests between two cohorts of mice. Performance between the two cohorts in the WM and RM tests were then separately compared. We showed that prior training of either test significantly reduced performance in the subsequent one. The statistical effect sizes in both directions were moderate to large. Although extended training could overcome the deficit, it could re-emerge later albeit in a more transient fashion. Whenever RM and WM water maze tests are conducted sequentially in the same animals – regardless of the test order, extra caution is necessary when interpreting the outcomes in the second test. Counterbalancing test orders between animals is recommended.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/74833
ISSN: 0166-4328
EISSN: 1872-7549
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.033
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article

Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

29
Citations as of Oct 14, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.