Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/74564
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Qen_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-29T07:17:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-29T07:17:12Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationCartographic journal, 2017, v. 54, no. 3, p. 254-264en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-7041-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/74564-
dc.description.abstractSelective omission is necessary for road network generalisation. This study investigates the use of supervised learning approaches for selective omission in a road network. To be specific, at first, the properties to measure the importance of a road in the network are viewed as input attributes, and the decision of such a road is retained or not at a specific scale is viewed as an output classMergeCell then, a number of samples with known input and output are used to train a classifierMergeCell finally, this classifier can be used to determine whether other roads to be retained or not. In this study, a total of nine supervised learning approaches, i.e., ID3, C4·5, CRT, Random Tree, support vector machine (SVM), naive Bayes (NB), K-nearest neighbour (KNN), multilayer perception (MP) and binary logistic regression (BLR), are applied to three road networks for selective omission. The performances of these approaches are evaluated by both quantitative assessment and visual inception. Results show that: (1) in most cases, these approaches are effective and their classification accuracy is between 70% and 90%MergeCell (2) most of these approaches have similar performances, and they do not have any statistically significant differenceMergeCell (3) but sometimes, ID3 and BLR performs significantly better than NB and SVMMergeCell NB and KNN perform significantly worse than MP, SVM and BLR.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informaticsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCartographic journalen_US
dc.subjectRoad networken_US
dc.subjectSelective omissionen_US
dc.subjectSupervised learningen_US
dc.titleA comparative study of various supervised learning approaches to selective omission in a road networken_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage254-
dc.identifier.epage264-
dc.identifier.volume54-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.doi10.1179/1743277414Y.0000000083-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84978532284-
dc.identifier.eissn1743-2774-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2017002052-
dc.description.ros2017-2018 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.validate201802 bcrc-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 6, 2019

Page view(s)

31
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Jun 11, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.