Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/7280
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Land Surveying and Geo-Informatics-
dc.creatorIz, HB-
dc.creatorShum, CK-
dc.creatorDing, XL-
dc.creatorDai, CL-
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-10T08:32:40Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-10T08:32:40Z-
dc.identifier.issn2081-9943 (print)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/7280-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDe Gruyter Open Ltden_US
dc.rights© Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication: Iz, H., Shum, C., Ding, X., & Dai, C. (2011). Orientation of the geometrically Best fitting triaxial lunar ellipsoid with respect to the mean earth/polar axis reference frame. Journal of Geodetic Science, 1(1), 52-58 is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10156-010-0007-2.en_US
dc.subjectEuler anglesen_US
dc.subjectLunar figureen_US
dc.subjectLunar laser altimetryen_US
dc.subjectLunar orientationen_US
dc.subjectChang'E-1en_US
dc.subjectSELENEen_US
dc.subjectULCN 2005en_US
dc.titleOrientation of the geometrically best fitting triaxial lunar ellipsoid with respect to the mean earth/polar axis reference frameen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this publication: X. L. Dingen_US
dc.identifier.spage52-
dc.identifier.epage58-
dc.identifier.volume1-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/v10156-010-0007-2-
dcterms.abstractThis study provides new estimates for the orientation of a geometrically best fitting lunar triaxial ellipsoid with respect to the mean Earth/polar axis reference frame calculated from the footprint positions of the Chang'E-1 (CE-1), SELenological and ENgineering Explorer (SELENE) laser altimetry measurements and Unified Lunar Control Networks 2005, (ULCN 2005) station coordinates. The semi-principal axes of the triaxial ellipsoid and the coordinates of its geometric center are also calculated simultaneously. All the estimated parameters from all three data sets are found to be consistent. In particular, the RMS differences of the semi-principal axes of the triaxial ellipsoids and the locations of their geometric centers from solutions with and without modeling Euler angles (orientation of the triaxial ellipsoid) using uniformly distributed laser altimetry (LAL) footprints are 29 and 31 m respectively. The misclosures of all the solutions indicate a better fit for the triaxial ellipsoid to the footprint and station coordinates if the Euler angles are included in the models.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of geodetic science, Mar. 2011, v. 1, no. 1, p. 52–58-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of geodetic science-
dcterms.issued2011-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr53152-
dc.description.ros2010-2011 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Iz_Orientation_Geometrically_Best.pdf374.26 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

141
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

178
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.