Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/71868
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building Services Engineering-
dc.creatorChen, X-
dc.creatorYang, H-
dc.creatorZhang, W-
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-30T09:45:25Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-30T09:45:25Z-
dc.identifier.issn1876-6102-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/71868-
dc.description8th International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE 2016, Beijing, China, 8-11 October 2016en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.rightsThe following publication Chen, X., Yang, H., & Zhang, W. (2017). A proposed new weighting system for passive design approach in BEAM Plus. Energy Procedia, 105, 2113-2118 is available athttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.593en_US
dc.subjectBEAMen_US
dc.subjectGreen buildingen_US
dc.subjectPassive designen_US
dc.subjectSensitivity analysisen_US
dc.subjectWeightingen_US
dc.titleA proposed new weighting system for passive design approach in BEAM Plusen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.identifier.spage2113-
dc.identifier.epage2118-
dc.identifier.volume105-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.593-
dcterms.abstractBuilding environmental assessment method (BEAM) has been practiced by local architects and engineers as references for green building design over the last 20 years. The current version of BEAM Plus v1.2 has introduced the passive design concept to make the rating scheme in line with the state-of-art energy efficient design in the world. However, the introduced passive design approach is criticized for its arguable criteria allocation, unjustified weighting system and incompatibility with the existing whole building energy simulation approach. In view of these flaws, a new weighting system based on different global sensitivity analysis methods, robust energy end-use statistics and a green building case study is proposed in this article. The total available credits of sub-criteria are determined according to the ratio of the cooling and lighting energy consumption in the total end-use energy data of residential buildings. Eventually, the priorities of assessment criteria are derived from the sensitivity analysis of a generic building model based on a simultaneous variation of different design parameters. The results from this research can help stakeholders in a green building project to identify design strategies with the largest impact over building performance and obtain an optimized preliminary design in the early planning stage.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationEnergy procedia, 2017, v. 105, no. , p. 2113-2118-
dcterms.isPartOfEnergy procedia-
dcterms.issued2017-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85020709383-
dc.identifier.ros2016004872-
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference on Applied Energy [ICAE]-
dc.identifier.eissn1876-6102-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2016004750-
dc.description.ros2016-2017 > Academic research: refereed > Refereed conference paper-
dc.description.validatebcwh-
dc.description.oaVersion of Recorden_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Conference Paper
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chen_New_Weighting_System.pdf293.53 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Version of Record
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

116
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

Downloads

71
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

7
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.