Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/71868
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Building Services Engineering | - |
dc.creator | Chen, X | - |
dc.creator | Yang, H | - |
dc.creator | Zhang, W | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-01-30T09:45:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-01-30T09:45:25Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1876-6102 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/71868 | - |
dc.description | 8th International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE 2016, Beijing, China, 8-11 October 2016 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). | en_US |
dc.rights | The following publication Chen, X., Yang, H., & Zhang, W. (2017). A proposed new weighting system for passive design approach in BEAM Plus. Energy Procedia, 105, 2113-2118 is available athttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.593 | en_US |
dc.subject | BEAM | en_US |
dc.subject | Green building | en_US |
dc.subject | Passive design | en_US |
dc.subject | Sensitivity analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Weighting | en_US |
dc.title | A proposed new weighting system for passive design approach in BEAM Plus | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 2113 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 2118 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 105 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.593 | - |
dcterms.abstract | Building environmental assessment method (BEAM) has been practiced by local architects and engineers as references for green building design over the last 20 years. The current version of BEAM Plus v1.2 has introduced the passive design concept to make the rating scheme in line with the state-of-art energy efficient design in the world. However, the introduced passive design approach is criticized for its arguable criteria allocation, unjustified weighting system and incompatibility with the existing whole building energy simulation approach. In view of these flaws, a new weighting system based on different global sensitivity analysis methods, robust energy end-use statistics and a green building case study is proposed in this article. The total available credits of sub-criteria are determined according to the ratio of the cooling and lighting energy consumption in the total end-use energy data of residential buildings. Eventually, the priorities of assessment criteria are derived from the sensitivity analysis of a generic building model based on a simultaneous variation of different design parameters. The results from this research can help stakeholders in a green building project to identify design strategies with the largest impact over building performance and obtain an optimized preliminary design in the early planning stage. | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Energy procedia, 2017, v. 105, no. , p. 2113-2118 | - |
dcterms.isPartOf | Energy procedia | - |
dcterms.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85020709383 | - |
dc.identifier.ros | 2016004872 | - |
dc.relation.conference | International Conference on Applied Energy [ICAE] | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1876-6102 | - |
dc.identifier.rosgroupid | 2016004750 | - |
dc.description.ros | 2016-2017 > Academic research: refereed > Refereed conference paper | - |
dc.description.validate | bcwh | - |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_IR/PIRA | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Conference Paper |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chen_New_Weighting_System.pdf | 293.53 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
116
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
Downloads
71
Citations as of Apr 21, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
10
Citations as of Apr 26, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
7
Last Week
0
0
Last month
Citations as of Apr 25, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.