Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/7153
PIRA download icon_1.1View/Download Full Text
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorTang, L-
dc.creatorShen, GQP-
dc.creatorCheng, EWL-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-11T08:26:50Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-11T08:26:50Z-
dc.identifier.issn0263-7863-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/7153-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2009 Elsevier Ltd and IPMA. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.rightsNOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Project Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Project Management, vol. 28, no. 7 (Oct 2010), DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.009.en_US
dc.subjectPublic–Private Partnerships (PPP)en_US
dc.subjectReviewen_US
dc.subjectPartneringen_US
dc.subjectPartnershipen_US
dc.subjectConstruction managementen_US
dc.titleA review of studies on Public–Private Partnership projects in the construction industryen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.description.otherinformationAuthor name used in this manuscript: Qiping Shenen_US
dc.identifier.spage683-
dc.identifier.epage694-
dc.identifier.volume28-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.11.009-
dcterms.abstractPublic–Private Partnership (PPP) in construction is gaining in popularity. Although papers published in major journals have documented real cases of PPP projects, there appears to be a lack of systematically summarizing what they have already provided. Consequently, this paper reviewed PPP studies published in the six top journals in the construction field. The objectives are to compare and contrast the findings of the studies so as to provide insights for directing further PPP research and improving the existing practices of PPP projects. To achieve the review objectives, studies were first classified as either empirical or non-empirical. Empirical studies were further grouped under three themes: risks, relationships, and financing. Non-empirical studies were grouped under five themes: financing, project success factors, risks, and concession period. Suggestions for further research are risks, financing, contractual agreements, development of PPP models, concession periods, and strategies in choosing the right type of PPP.-
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationInternational journal of project management, Oct. 2010, v. 28, no. 7, p. 683–694-
dcterms.isPartOfInternational journal of project management-
dcterms.issued2010-10-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4634-
dc.identifier.rosgroupidr51494-
dc.description.ros2010-2011 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
dc.description.oaAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.FolderNumberOA_IR/PIRAen_US
dc.description.pubStatusPublisheden_US
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Tang_Review_Public_Private.pdfPre-published version117.9 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Open Access Information
Status open access
File Version Final Accepted Manuscript
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

Page views

282
Last Week
1
Last month
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

Downloads

4,739
Citations as of Apr 14, 2024

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

300
Last Week
3
Last month
3
Citations as of Apr 19, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

259
Last Week
1
Last month
1
Citations as of Apr 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.