Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Subjective outcome evaluation based on the program participants : does dosage matter?
Authors: Shek, DTL 
Leung, H 
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Springer
Source: In DTL Shek & RCF Sun (Eds.), Development and evaluation of positive adolescent training through holistic social programs (P.A.T.H.S.), p. 107-119. Singapore ; New York: Springer, 2013 How to cite?
Abstract: Subjective outcome evaluation findings based on the participants of the Project P.A.T.H.S. collected from 2005 to 2009 were examined in this chapter with particular reference to program dosage (i.e., 10-h program vs. 20-h program). Results showed that participants generally had positive evaluations of the program, implementers, and benefits of the Tier 1 Program. While respondents in the 20-h full program perceived the program implementers more positively than those in the 10-h core program, program dosage did not influence participants’ perception of the qualities of program content and program effectiveness.
ISBN: 9814451541 (electronic bk.)
9789814451543 (electronic bk.)
9814451533 (print)
9789814451536 (print)
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-4451-54-3_7
Appears in Collections:Book Chapter

View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
Citations as of Jul 15, 2018

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.