Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Subjective outcome evaluation based on the program participants : does dosage matter?||Authors:||Shek, DTL
|Issue Date:||2013||Publisher:||Springer||Source:||In DTL Shek & RCF Sun (Eds.), Development and evaluation of positive adolescent training through holistic social programs (P.A.T.H.S.), p. 107-119. Singapore ; New York: Springer, 2013 How to cite?||Abstract:||Subjective outcome evaluation findings based on the participants of the Project P.A.T.H.S. collected from 2005 to 2009 were examined in this chapter with particular reference to program dosage (i.e., 10-h program vs. 20-h program). Results showed that participants generally had positive evaluations of the program, implementers, and benefits of the Tier 1 Program. While respondents in the 20-h full program perceived the program implementers more positively than those in the 10-h core program, program dosage did not influence participants’ perception of the qualities of program content and program effectiveness.||URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10397/69731||ISBN:||9814451541 (electronic bk.)
9789814451543 (electronic bk.)
|Appears in Collections:||Book Chapter|
Show full item record
Citations as of Dec 11, 2017
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.