Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6918
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | Department of Applied Physics | - |
dc.creator | Ma, D | - |
dc.creator | Zhang, T | - |
dc.creator | Ong, CW | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-11T08:26:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-11T08:26:16Z | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0884-2914 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10397/6918 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2006 Materials Research Society. The following article "Dejun Ma, Taihua Zhang and Chung Wo Ong (2006). Evaluation of the effectiveness of representative methods for determining Young's modulus and hardness from instrumented indentation data. Journal of Materials Research, 21(1), pp 225-233. doi:10.1557/jmr.2006.0019." is available at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=8029975 | en_US |
dc.subject | Computer simulation | en_US |
dc.subject | Elastic moduli | en_US |
dc.subject | Estimation | en_US |
dc.subject | Finite element method | en_US |
dc.subject | Hardness | en_US |
dc.subject | Yield stress | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of the effectiveness of representative methods for determining Young’s modulus and hardness from instrumented indentation data | en_US |
dc.type | Journal/Magazine Article | en_US |
dc.description.otherinformation | Author name used in this publication: Chung Wo Ong | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 225 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 233 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 21 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1557/JMR.2006.0019 | - |
dcterms.abstract | The effectiveness of Oliver & Pharr's (O&P's) method, Cheng & Cheng's (C&C's) method, and a new method developed by our group for estimating Young's modulus and hardness based on instrumented indentation was evaluated for the case of yield stress to reduced Young's modulus ratio (σ[sub y]/E[sub r]) ≥ 4.55 × 10⁻⁴ and hardening coefficient (n) ≤ 0.45. Dimensional theorem and finite element simulations were applied to produce reference results for this purpose. Both O&P's and C&C's methods overestimated the Young's modulus under some conditions, whereas the error can be controlled within ± 16% if the formulation was modified with appropriate correction functions. Similar modification was not introduced to our method for determining Young's modulus, while the maximum error of results was around ± 13%. The errors of hardness values obtained from all the three methods could be even larger and were irreducible with any correction scheme. It is therefore suggested that when hardness values of different materials are concerned, relative comparison of the data obtained from a single standard measurement technique would be more practically useful. It is noted that the ranges of error derived from the analysis could be different if different ranges of material parameters σ[sub y]/E[sub r] and n are considered. | - |
dcterms.accessRights | open access | en_US |
dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Journal of materials research, Jan. 2006, v. 21, no. 1, p. 225-233 | - |
dcterms.isPartOf | Journal of materials research | - |
dcterms.issued | 2006-01 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000234582900029 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-33644546008 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2044-5326 | - |
dc.identifier.rosgroupid | r28639 | - |
dc.description.ros | 2005-2006 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal | - |
dc.description.oa | Version of Record | en_US |
dc.identifier.FolderNumber | OA_IR/PIRA | en_US |
dc.description.pubStatus | Published | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal/Magazine Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ma_Young_Modulus_Hardness.pdf | 180.09 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page views
109
Last Week
1
1
Last month
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024
Downloads
183
Citations as of Mar 24, 2024
SCOPUSTM
Citations
11
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of Mar 28, 2024
WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations
8
Last Week
0
0
Last month
0
0
Citations as of Mar 28, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.