Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10397/68901
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Building and Real Estate-
dc.creatorFong, PSW-
dc.creatorChang, X-
dc.creatorChen, Q-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-30T07:54:36Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-30T07:54:36Z-
dc.identifier.issn0892-9912-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10397/68901-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLCen_US
dc.subjectPatent assignmenten_US
dc.subjectInvention disclosureen_US
dc.subjectUniversity-industry technology transferen_US
dc.subjectChinese Mainlanden_US
dc.titleFaculty patent assignment in the Chinese mainland : evidence from the top 35 patent application universitiesen_US
dc.typeJournal/Magazine Articleen_US
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage27-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10961-015-9434-7-
dcterms.abstractRecent research has explored the issue of university faculty patent assignment in the US, Europe and Japan from the individual or organization perspectives. However, there is limited empirical research that examines the real picture of faculty patent assignment in China’s universities. This paper aimed to fill this gap by creating a special dataset including 18,435 faculty/patent pairs. The investigation indicated that 13.16 % of pairs were not solely assigned to universities in 35 top patent application Chinese universities from 2002 to 2012. The empirical study correlates types of patent assignment to invention characteristics, university intellectual eminence and licensing policies, and illustrates that patent assignment changes depending on the research field, that university assignment is positively related to patent claims but negatively related to patent validity, patent maintenance time, and number of co-inventors, and that university intellectual eminence has a weak impact. Through controlling the influence of inventor characteristics, university royalty and equality policies play different roles in faculty patent assignment. This paper provides new insights as well as operational policy implications for China’s university policy makers.-
dcterms.bibliographicCitationJournal of technology transfer, 2015, p. 1-27-
dcterms.isPartOfJournal of technology transfer-
dcterms.issued2015-
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7047-
dc.identifier.rosgroupid2015001714-
dc.description.ros2015-2016 > Academic research: refereed > Publication in refereed journal-
Appears in Collections:Journal/Magazine Article
Access
View full-text via PolyU eLinks SFX Query
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Aug 14, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

5
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 21, 2020

Page view(s)

106
Last Week
0
Last month
Citations as of Oct 25, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.